[Springboard] Salmon Denver Springboard Gathering News

[James Wiegel]

Was John ever, really fully TRANSPOSED?  John Epps, I mean . . .

Marilyn R Crocker <marilyncrocker at juno.com> wrote:      Dear Bill (Salmon) and Jim (Wiegel),
   
  As I recall things back when I was assigned to Research Centrum, the work of transposing John (plus the development of a study guide) was done by John Epps and Bill and Nan Grow for use by Bishop Jim, initially with his UMC District Superintendents when he was Bishop serving in the DC Area, and probably later, with pastors throughout the districts.  It may have been that the Grows and Epps actually provided the initial training in the methods, I can't recall.
   
  Bill and Nan, might you weigh in on this?  I know that a number of Joe Crocker's UMC colleagues from New England, who later became highly placed in the UMC hierarchy, have spoken enthusiastically over the decades to Joe and me about the value of this profound curriculum, as well as many other EI constructs offered to the wider connectional system through Bishop Jim, both here in New England and in his other Episcopacies.
   
  I'm thinking this falls into the category of "What God Has Wrought."
   
  Grace and peace,
   
  Marilyn
   
  
Marilyn R. Crocker, Ed.D
Crocker & Associates, Inc.
123 Sanborn Road
West Newfield, ME 04095
(207) 793-3711

   
   
   
  On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 16:45:40 -0500 "Bill Salmon" <wsalmon at cox.net> writes:
    My best recollection is that this was, essentially, an Art Form Conversation. I'll see what I can find. Also, LeRoy Philbrook fixed the Buddah document for me, and I'll see what kind of a chart I can quickly produce. Bill 
    ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: James Wiegel 
  To: Springboard Dialogue 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:40 PM
  Subject: Re: [Springboard] Denver Springboard Gathering News
  

  Yes, at breakfast collegium . . . a verse from the lectionary . . . the scripture part of the scripture / news conversations
   
  I remember John Epps and others developing some sort of approach for transposing 1st John . . . 

Bill Salmon <wsalmon at cox.net> wrote:
          Jim --
      Maybe I'm out of the loop here, but give me a little more context. Was this "scripture conversation" used in which course? Are you speaking of the Gospel Lection? What is the context of your question regarding being "transposed in the 1st John work?" 
      At 5th City AM collegiums we once did Scripture Conversations tied to 5 minutes of TV "World" conversations" too. 
      I've got pretty good notes that I "borrowed" from several substantial Academy staff, plus I've got my own and Beverly's notes as well,  and I can do a search if it is necessary.
      Bill Salmon
    ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: James Wiegel 
  To: Springboard Dialogue 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 12:15 PM
  Subject: Re: [Springboard] Denver Springboard Gathering News
  

What were the questions for the scripture conversation?  Was it the capital verse?  Also, was this verse transposed in the 1st John work?

  
 _______________________________________________
Springboard mailing list
Springboard at wedgeblade.net
http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/springboard_wedgeblade.net



401 North Beverly Way   
Tolleson, Arizona 85353-2401
+1  623-936-8671
+1  623-363-3277
   jfwiegel at yahoo.com
   www.partnersinparticipation.com

Strangely enough, this is the past that somebody in the future is longing to go back to.    Ashleigh Brilliant
       
---------------------------------
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/springboard_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20080402/453b1cfb/attachment.html