[Springboard] July Gathering

[James Wiegel]

Wouldn't a fourth be oikos scholars and others involved in development of moral leadership to deal with the challenges of this current century?

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 16, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Jack Gilles <icabombay at igc.org> wrote:

Colleagues,

Here is a "what if" to consider.  It seems that it would be critical to focus a bit on the "who" we would be sharing our history/wisdom with.  Although there are millions of people who would be seen as Those Who Care (TWC), if we were to have a particular group in mind we could design our work to meet their needs.  So what if we were to focus on all the global ICA staff who, for the most part, never knew of the depth contexts of how we did what we did?  It would serve the function of strengthening the national ICA's, build common memory and perhaps could be the basis for what we called priorship development.  A second group could be the ToP network.  They obviously are aware of the ICA source for the methods, and some have been exposed to the deeper context of where and how they evolved.  But most have no awareness of all the other dimensions that are part of what makes ToPs work.  A third body (and we could combine any of these if it seems appropriate)
 would be personal friends and colleagues with whom we've become involved with and would want to learn just how you became the "crazy" that you are (just kidding!).  If we had a group we could focus on and do pilot work on and who had some context of where it came from and who we are, then it would be easier to create and experiment.

What do you think??

Jack

_______________________________________________
Springboard mailing list
Springboard at wedgeblade.net
http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/springboard_wedgeblade.net