[Springboard] July Gathering
Jack Gilles
icabombay at igc.org
Wed Jun 16 23:24:52 CDT 2010
Jim,
Why not! I forgot them as a possibility. I kind of thought that the
three year timeline Mark laid out for OIKOS/ICA joint work to be what
the relationship entails. But you raise another option that could
become a parallel stream of work. Let's see how the meeting goes.
Not sure how we would get this option before them when we haven't
talked it through yet, but let's not sweat that now. Keep thinking!
Jack
On Jun 17, 2010, at 12:10 AM, James Wiegel wrote:
> Wouldn't a fourth be oikos scholars and others involved in
> development of moral leadership to deal with the challenges of this
> current century?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jun 16, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Jack Gilles <icabombay at igc.org> wrote:
>
> Colleagues,
>
> Here is a "what if" to consider. It seems that it would be critical
> to focus a bit on the "who" we would be sharing our history/wisdom
> with. Although there are millions of people who would be seen as
> Those Who Care (TWC), if we were to have a particular group in mind
> we could design our work to meet their needs. So what if we were to
> focus on all the global ICA staff who, for the most part, never knew
> of the depth contexts of how we did what we did? It would serve the
> function of strengthening the national ICA's, build common memory
> and perhaps could be the basis for what we called priorship
> development. A second group could be the ToP network. They
> obviously are aware of the ICA source for the methods, and some have
> been exposed to the deeper context of where and how they evolved.
> But most have no awareness of all the other dimensions that are part
> of what makes ToPs work. A third body (and we could combine any of
> these if it seems appropriate)
> would be personal friends and colleagues with whom we've become
> involved with and would want to learn just how you became the
> "crazy" that you are (just kidding!). If we had a group we could
> focus on and do pilot work on and who had some context of where it
> came from and who we are, then it would be easier to create and
> experiment.
>
> What do you think??
>
> Jack
>
> _______________________________________________
> Springboard mailing list
> Springboard at wedgeblade.net
> http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/springboard_wedgeblade.net
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Springboard mailing list
> Springboard at wedgeblade.net
> http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/springboard_wedgeblade.net
More information about the Springboard
mailing list