[Dialogue] Fahrenheit 9/11
TCWright@aol.com
TCWright at aol.com
Thu Jul 1 23:41:42 EDT 2004
Went to see "Fahrenheit 9/11" yesterday with a friend. I did not like the
experience, but I'm glad I went. It is most illuminating on a variety of fronts.
Chief of these was the establishment of a link between attitudes and events.
Since when have attitudes broken free of personal preferences, and by default
influenced really important decisions?
As we walked to the car my friend said, "Well, what do you think?" My
response was, "I'm not thinking, I'm feeling!" Intellectual, it isn't. The arguments
presented are not clear or complete, and there is much left to wish for about
its documentation. But that's exactly what he was out to do: leave the viewer
with lots of true data, leaving the weaving of a rational statement to the
viewer. He doesn't care whether you agree with him; he just wants to shock you
awake so you are maybe disturbed about what apparently is going on in Iraq and
with our government officials. His point is, this doesn't make sense, from any
angle.
So he makes a lot of cheap shots, so his data is only partially grounded in
reality, so what? So you don't have any doubts? Of course you do; open your
eyes and your heart and think for a minute. Let frightening reality sink in and
see if you need to change your appropriation of this war. During the movie
there isn't really time to
think, only to absorb the images or furiously, impulsively, reject the whole
thing out-of-hand. It is only partially history; it's more nearly a classic
sermon. Everybody should see it, no matter their persuasion or their political
loyalties. He doesn't even mention the insurgency or the political transition
taking place now. He keeps the focus on the presence or absence of COMPASSION
as an alternative to WAR, and perhaps to gross INCOMPETENCE. He invites you
to BE there and it's almost impossible to refuse the invitation. Thats why I
was in shock as I left the theater.
I am no longer in shock, I think. Feeling just a cold, hard anger at the
vagaries of history as it unfolds. Not anger at a person or persons, all of whom
are operating within an inhumanly complex context. This does not excuse the
decisions made, it simply holds the decision-makers in compassion. It means
nothing to say this war is an error glued to the face of history. This war is the
face of God in history. An ugly face. The bottom-line
question is, how do we participate in building the hopefully new nation of
Iraq with brave Iraquis ready to make the attempt, with all the implications for
the Middle East in the balance. Bloody war has opened those possibilities. I
give thanks for the past; I wonder about the future.
TCWright
July 1, 2004
More information about the Dialogue
mailing list