[Dialogue] The Game Is Over
Mejpoole@aol.com
Mejpoole at aol.com
Tue Aug 23 12:53:54 EDT 2005
In a message dated 8/23/2005 8:54:11 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
aulangca at stny.rr.com writes:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's over. For the United States to win the Iraq war requires three things:
defeating the Iraqi resistance; establishing a stable government in Iraq that
is friendly to the US; maintaining the support of the American people while
the first two are being none. None of these three seem any longer possible.
First, the US military itself no longer believes it can defeat the resistance.
Secondly, the likelihood that the Iraqi politicians can agree on a
constitution is almost nil, and therefore the likelihood of a minimally stable central
government is almost nil. Thirdly, the US public is turning against the war
because it sees no "light at the end of the tunnel".
As a result, the Bush regime is in an impossible position. It would like to
withdraw in a dignified manner, asserting some semblance of victory. But, if
it tries to do this, it will face ferocious anger and deception on the part
of the war party at home. And if it does not, it will face ferocious anger on
the part of the withdrawal party. It will end up satisfying neither, lose
face precipitously, and be remembered in ignominy.
Let us see what is happening. This month, George Casey, the US commanding
general in Iraq, suggested that it may be possible to reduce US troops in Iraq
next year by 30,000, given improvements in the ability of the Iraqi
government's armed forces to handle the situation. Almost immediately, this position
came under attack from the war party, and the Pentagon amended this statement
to suggest that maybe this wouldn't happen, since maybe the Iraqi forces were
not yet ready to handle the situation, which is surely so. At the same time,
stories appeared in the leading newspapers suggesting that the level of
military sophistication of the insurgent forces has been growing steadily and
remarkably. And the increased rate of killings of US soldiers certainly bears
this out.
In the debate on the Iraqi constitution, there are two major problems. One
is the degree to which the constitution will institutionalise Islamic law. It
is conceivable that, given enough time and trust, there could be a compromise
on this issue that would more or less satisfy most sides. But the second
issue is more intractable. The Kurds, who still really want an independent
state, will not settle for less than a federal structure that will guarantee their
autonomy, the maintenance of their militia, and control of Kirkuk as their
capital and its oil resources as their booty. The Shia are currently divided
between those who feel like the Kurds and want a federal structure, and those
who prefer a strong central government provided they can control it and its
resources, and provided that it will have an Islamic flavour. And the Sunnis
are desperate to maintain a united state, one in which they will minimally get
their fair share, and certainly don't want a state governed by Shia
interpretations of Islam.
The US has been trying to encourage some compromise, but it is hard to see
what this might be. So, one of two possibilities are before us right now. The
Iraqis paper over the differences in some way that will not last long. Or
there is a more immediate breakdown in negotiations. Neither of these meets the
needs of the US. Of course, there is one solution that might end the
deadlock. The Iraqi politicians could join the resisters in a nationalist
anti-American thrust, and thereby unite at least the non-Kurd part of the population.
This development is not to be ruled out, and of course is a nightmare from the
US point of view.
But, for the Bush regime, the worst picture of all is on the home front.
Approval rating of Bush for the conduct of the Iraqi war has gone down to 36 per
cent. The figures have been going steadily down for some time and should
continue to do so. For poor George W Bush is now faced with the vigil of Cindy
Sheehan. She is a 48-year-old mother of a soldier who was killed in Iraq a
year ago. Incensed by Bush's statement that the US soldiers died in a "noble
cause", she decided to go to Crawford, Texas, and ask to see the president so
that he could explain to her for what "noble cause" her son died.
Of course, Bush hasn't had the courage to see her. He sent out emissaries.
She said this wasn't enough, that she wanted to see Bush personally. She has
now said that she will maintain a vigil outside Bush's home until either he
sees her or she is arrested. At first, the press ignored her. But now, other
mothers of soldiers in Iraq have come to join her. She is getting moral support
from more and more people who had previously supported the war. And the
national press now has turned her into a major celebrity, some comparing her to
Rosa Parks, the Black lady whose refusal to move to the back of the bus in
Atlanta a half- century ago was the spark that transformed the struggle for
Black rights into a mainstream cause.
Bush won't see her because he knows there is nothing that he can say to her.
Seeing her is a losing proposition. But so is not seeing her. The pressure
to withdraw from Iraq is now becoming mainstream. It is not because the US
public shares the view that the US is an imperialist power in Iraq. It is
because there seems to be no light at the end of the tunnel. Or rather there is a
light, the light an acerbic Canadian cartoonist for the Calgary Sun drew
recently. He shows a US soldier in a dark tunnel approaching someone to whose body
is attached an array of explosives. The light comes from the match he is
holding to the wick that will cause them to explode. In the month following the
attacks in London and the high level of US deaths in Iraq, this is the light
that the US public is beginning to see. They want out. Bush is caught in an
insoluble dilemma. The war is lost.
**************************
Janice Ulangca
3413 Stratford Drive
Vestal, NY 13850
607-797-4595
aulangca at stny.rr.com
***************************
_______________________________________________
Dialogue mailing list
Dialogue at wedgeblade.net
More information about the Dialogue
mailing list