[Dialogue] [Fwd: [IP] Face to Face with the Great Firewall of China]

jim rippey jimripsr at qwest.net
Mon May 2 17:37:27 EDT 2005


This is indeed scary.  And worst of all, it is another example of what is 
happening all over the world, very much including here in Dubya's USA.  I am 
trying to connect the related dots and this is useful input.

Jim Rippey in Bellevue, NE


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Reames" <popgoesweasel at coralpost.net>
To: "Colleague Dialogue" <Dialogue at wedgeblade.net>
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 8:46 AM
Subject: [Dialogue] [Fwd: [IP] Face to Face with the Great Firewall of 
China]


> This is the scariest article that I have read in a loooong time!
>
> Ed Reames
> La Rivera de Belén
> Costa Rica
> 745 Central American Time
> 21C   Clear   78% Humidity
> Wind 11kph from the NE
> Pressure 30.03
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [IP] Face to Face with the Great Firewall of China
> Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 08:10:09 -0400
> From: David Farber <dave at farber.net>
> Reply-To: dave at farber.net
> To: Ip <ip at v2.listbox.com>
> References: <p062007cdbe9b53eaf38c@[10.0.1.54]>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Michael Geist <mgeist at pobox.com>
> Date: May 2, 2005 7:21:16 AM EDT
> To: dave at farber.net
> Subject: Face to Face with the Great Firewall of China
>
>
> Dave,
>
> Of possible interest - my regular Law Bytes column reflects on a  recent 
> trip to China and the frustrations I encountered dealing with  censorship 
> of the Internet.  Despite similar appearances with  broadband access in my 
> Beijing hotel, I found sites blocked, email  downloads short-circuited, 
> and Google searches cut off.
>
> The column (posted below) notes that the experience was a powerful 
> reminder that unfettered Internet access is far more fragile than is 
> commonly perceived.  I try to connect the Chinese firewall experience  to 
> recent events in Canada (including web-based disclosures of  information 
> subject to publication bans and law enforcement  authorities for greater 
> surveillance powers) and conclude that it  would be mistake to think that 
> the North American Internet will  always remain as free as China's is 
> censored. The challenge in the  months and years ahead will be to promote 
> a vision of online freedom  through lobbying for greater access abroad and 
> rejecting unnecessary  and potentially dangerous limits at home.
>
> A freely available hyperlinked version of the column is at
> http://www.michaelgeist.ca/resc/html_bkup/may22005.html
> Toronto Star reg. version at
> <http://geistchinafirewall.notlong.com>
>
> MG
>
> FACE TO FACE WITH THE GREAT FIREWALL OF CHINA
>
> May 2, 2005
>
> Michael Geist
>
> As the Internet was taking flight in the early 1990s, John Gilmore,  one 
> of the co-founders of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a  leading 
> online civil liberties group, is credited with having coined  the infamous 
> phrase that "the Internet interprets censorship as  damage and routes 
> around it."  Gilmore's view has since been  regularly invoked whenever 
> there are failed attempts to limit the  dissemination of information.
>
> Beginning with a string of cases dating back to the Paul Bernardo  trial 
> in the mid-1990s, the Internet has undermined court-ordered  publication 
> bans in Canada with surprising frequency. The latest  incident occurred 
> last month when a U.S. website posted evidence from  the Gomery inquiry 
> that was subject to a publication ban.  The ban  was lifted within days, 
> however, as Judge Gomery acknowledged what  had become obvious to all - 
> supposedly secret testimony was readily  available to anyone with Internet 
> access.
>
> While these events seemingly affirm the notion that the Internet is 
> beyond the reach of governments and courts, my recent trip to China 
> provided a powerful reminder that unfettered Internet access is far  more 
> fragile than is commonly perceived.  China, which boasts the  world's 
> second largest Internet user base, is currently home to more  than 94 
> million Internet users, yet their Internet is far different  from ours.
>
> These differences are not immediately obvious.  My hotel in Beijing 
> featured high-speed Internet access much like that offered in hotels 
> throughout North America.  Logging onto the network was a snap and I 
> quickly found that bandwidth speeds were comparable to those found at 
> home.
>
> It was once I sought to access common news sites that I found myself  face 
> to face with the "Great Firewall of China."  Google News, a  popular 
> aggregator of news stories from around the world, would not  load into my 
> browser, apparently blocked by a filtering system that  employs 30,000 
> people to regularly monitor Internet traffic and  content.  Similarly, 
> while the BBC website would load, attempts to  access news stories on that 
> site yielded only error messages.
>
> My frustration increased when I attempted to download my own email. 
> While I was able to access my Canadian-based mail server storing my 
> messages, the download was short-circuited midway as I suddenly lost  the 
> connection.  Although I initially thought that perhaps the error  lay at 
> the Canadian end, when the experience repeated itself, it  became clear 
> that the Chinese system was filtering my email messages  and cutting off 
> the connection.
>
> Having experienced limits in accessing both news and email, it came  as 
> little surprise to find that the search engines were subject to  similar 
> restrictions.  Searches for articles on circumventing the  Chinese filters 
> yielded a long list of results, none of which could  be opened.  Moreover, 
> inputting politically sensitive words such as  the "Falun Gong" cut me off 
> from the search engines completely.
>
> While I found using the Chinese Internet exceptionally frustrating,  most 
> people I spoke to were resigned to an Internet with limits.   They live 
> with the fact that in recent months the government has shut  down 
> thousands of Internet cafes, an important point of access for  many 
> citizens.  Many noted that the censorship "only" affected  political 
> information, but that business could be conducted online  unimpeded.  At 
> one academic conference, Chinese law professors even  spoke of the 
> desirability of increased content regulation and  supported government 
> limits on search engine results.
>
> As groups such as Amnesty International and Reporters Without Borders 
> regularly seek to remind us, the Chinese Internet is not unique. 
> Countries throughout the Middle East and in parts of Asia employ  similar 
> technologies to limit their citizens' access to a medium that  most 
> Canadians now take for granted.
>
> It would be a mistake, however, to think that the Canadian Internet  will 
> always remain just as free as China's is censored.  Canadian law 
> enforcement officials are actively lobbying for a series of "lawful 
> access" reforms that will provide authorities with dramatically  increased 
> Internet surveillance powers.  These include mandating real- time network 
> surveillance capabilities on Canada's biggest Internet  service providers 
> and providing authorities with the right to demand  subscriber information 
> without the need to obtain a prior court order.
>
> While it would be unfair to characterize the lawful access proposal  as 
> comparable to the monitoring and censorship used in the Chinese  Internet, 
> my experience provided a sobering reminder of the dangers  inherent in 
> increased surveillance and weakened judicial oversight.
> The Internet may be accessible from Toronto to Beijing, yet people in 
> these two cities do not access the same Internet.  The challenge in  the 
> months and years ahead will be to promote Gilmore's vision of  online 
> freedom through lobbying for greater access abroad and  rejecting 
> unnecessary and potentially dangerous limits at home.
>
> --
> **********************************************************************
> Professor Michael A. Geist
> Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law
> University of Ottawa Law School, Common Law Section
> 57 Louis Pasteur St., Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5
> Tel: 613-562-5800, x3319     Fax: 613-562-5124
> mgeist at pobox.com              http://www.michaelgeist.ca
>
>
> -------------------------------------
> You are subscribed as popgoesweasel at coralpost.net
> To manage your subscription, go to
> http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
>
> Archives at: 
> http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dialogue mailing list
> Dialogue at wedgeblade.net
> http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/dialogue_wedgeblade.net
> 





More information about the Dialogue mailing list