[Dialogue] U.S.-Backed Meeting of Muslim Nations Ends in Discord

Harry Wainwright h-wainwright at charter.net
Sat Nov 12 12:26:45 EST 2005


Colleagues, another view. Peace, Harry 
  _____  


 <http://www.nytimes.com/> The New York Times <http://www.nytimes.com/> 


November 13, 2005

U.S.-Backed Meeting of Muslim Nations Ends in Discord 

By STEVEN R. WEISMAN
<http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?ppds=bylL&v1=STEVEN%20R.%20WEISMAN&fd
q=19960101&td=sysdate&sort=newest&ac=STEVEN%20R.%20WEISMAN&inline=nyt-per> 

MANAMA, Bahrain
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/ba
hrain/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> , Nov. 12 - A meeting of Muslim nations
initiated by the Bush administration ended in discord on Saturday after
objections by Egypt
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/eg
ypt/index.html?inline=nyt-geo>  blocked a final declaration supporting
democracy. The administration had hoped to get backing for a $50 million
foundation to support political activities in the Muslim world, with money
to be raised from American, European and Arab sources, and a $100 million
fund largely financed by the United States to provide venture capital to
businesses. 

Diplomats at the conference said Egypt wanted the language in the meeting's
final declaration to say that only "legally registered" groups should be
aided by the foundation.

The Americans expressed open irritation with Egypt for its efforts to
"scuttle," as one put it, what they had hoped would be a milestone in its
efforts to promote democracy in the Middle East. 

"Obviously, we are not pleased," a senior State Department official said.
Another said, in a tone of exasperation, "I don't understand why they should
make this an issue." Both declined to be identified because they did not
want to criticize Egypt directly.

Egyptian diplomats have complained that outside financing for groups may end
up in the hands of extremists or even terrorists. American officials dismiss
those warnings as absurd, noting that some American aid to Egypt, about $430
million this year, already goes to groups in Egypt that do not have
government approval.

But American support for independent groups in other countries has alarmed
some Arab leaders. They cite American aid that supported groups that led the
uprisings in Georgia and Ukraine and point out that both Russia and
Uzbekistan have sought to block American aid to groups in their countries.

Since President Bush's inaugural address in January calling for sweeping
adopting of democratic rule in autocratic countries, the administration has
pressed more and more for aid to the Middle East to go, at least in part, to
groups supporting change in their societies, with training, subsidies and
such mundane things as printing presses. 

The administration first set up its own Middle East Partnership Initiative,
which committed $300 million in aid in the last few years to political and
business activity in the region. 

Now, in part to remove the taint of American fingerprints in a region where
anti-American sentiments run high, about $85 million money is to be taken
out of this initiative and spun off to the new Foundation for the Future,
for support of democratic groups, and the Fund for the Future, for
entrepreneurial efforts. Both are part of the Bush administration's
so-called Broader Middle East and North Africa initiative, which was set up
in the meeting of the major industrial democracies at Sea Island, Ga., in
mid-2004.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/r/condoleezza_ri
ce/index.html?inline=nyt-per> , in remarks at the session of the conference,
hailed the foundation's establishment, which had been negotiated for a year
and a half, saying it "will provide grants to help civil society strengthen
the rule of law, to protect basic civil liberties and ensure greater
opportunity for health and education."

Some delegates to the meeting saw Egypt's objections as a reflection of the
Arab world's growing irritation with what some say is the lecturing tone of
American calls for democracy. United States involvement in Iraq plays a part
in that: the Arab world is not persuaded by the administration's portrayal
of Iraq, which Secretary Rice visited on Friday, as a beacon for democracy. 

Rather, they say, Iraq represents the perils of imposing democracy from
outside. Its current chaos and violence is widely seen as a cautionary tale
rather than an inspiration, American officials acknowledge.

Egypt represents more than half the population of the Arab world and is
often a leader of its political concerns, particularly in pressing for more
attention to be paid in the West to the tensions between Israel and the
Palestinians. The disagreement also appeared to reflect a difficult phase in
American-Egyptian relations, which have been ruffled by American demands for
greater openness in the Egyptian political process.

Egypt rejected an American suggestion for international monitors for its
recent presidential election, for example, and complained that it was not
receiving credit for conducting its first multiparty elections and for
allowing more dissident political activity. 

The Egyptian foreign minister, Ahmed Aboul Gheit, left the conference early,
declining to join in the final photograph and working lunch, brushing off
questions about the final document, telling reporters that there was no such
thing, even though a draft had been circulating all day.

But Amr Moussa, a former Egyptian foreign minister who is president of the
Arab League, said the final document supporting democracy did not reflect
the meeting's consensus. "If a statement is imposed, nobody will give it any
consideration," he said. 

Egypt's criticism was backed by Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf country of
Oman, but diplomats said both had agreed in the end to a declaration that
had no reference to nongovernment groups.

The Bahrain foreign minister, Sheik Khalid bin Ahmed al-Khalifa, who
presided over the session on Saturday, told a news conference that Egypt's
objections to the language could not be ironed out because they were
presented at the last moment.

"We don't want this to be a haphazard decision," he said. "Due to the short
time we had, we didn't have enough time to discuss it." 

A draft of the final declaration was prepared more than a month ago, at a
meeting in Rabat, Morocco. Mr. Khalifa said a draft might be adopted in a
year at the next meeting, in Amman, Jordan. 

*	Copyright
<http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/copyright.html>  2005 The New
York Times Company <http://www.nytco.com/> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20051112/9d9fd303/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 1810 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20051112/9d9fd303/attachment.gif


More information about the Dialogue mailing list