[Dialogue] The "Religion in the US" debate
frank bremner
fjbremner at hotmail.com
Mon Aug 7 03:14:58 EST 2006
Dear colleagues:
G'day!
I've been "enjoying" the discussion about the role of religion in US
politics. There are some Australian resonances, but not always equivalents.
I'll post some information about this in te fulness of time.
I just want to mention a book I came across a few years back and which was
useful to me. Os Guiness, an English evangelical Christian, now working in
the USA, wrote "Fit Bodies, Fat Minds: Why Evangelicals Don't Think". It
gave me an understanding of the frontier mentality of much US
evangelicalism.
When towns developed suburbs and "going to church" became a matter of
respectability, and being a parson lost its cutting edge - at the personal
or social level - and became very pastoral and domesticated ..... some
people hit the road or horse-trail to be on the cutting edge (as they saw
it).
The pastors back in the suburbs, or whatever, linked up with the
universities and theological colleges etc, while the frontier folks eschewed
intellectualising and preferred matters of the heart and conversion. (We've
recently seen the TV series "Carnivale" here.) Those slick city folks got
more comfortable and respectable and full of long words and fancy-sounding
ideas. The frontier folks got more evangelical, and the suburban/city folks
got more liberal.
That's a caricature, but it informed me of part of my Methodist heritage.
I once had to explain to a teaching colleague that "domestic" (matters of
the home) was not the same as "domesticated" (especially in the way Nikos
Kazantzakis used the word).
My concerns about Guiness' book:
(1) He dismisses liberalism out of hand in one paragraph, pointing to some
feminist liturgical gathering as something to pour scorn upon. He doesn't
seem to have any notion at all of what's going on there. He's almost
smart-arse in his comments.
(2) He is worried about evangelicals moving to Catholicism or Orthodoxy -
but he seems to be really ignorant of the attraction and of the riches of
those traditions. He displays appalling ignorance on this point.
Some of you may be able to offer more comments on his critique of
evangelicalism.
I ran into him in Adelaide, South Australia, back in 1976 or so, when he
spoke at a one- (or two-?) day conference at Nunyara, Belair (the site of
our Australia Sunmmer 69, the first EI summer program outside the USA). He
used the phrase "newspaper in one hand, Bible in the other" and I learned it
had come from Karl Barth.
That phrase first entered my consciousness in the second half of the 1960s
when Rev Eric Nicholls, a Welsh Methodist of the radical stream, preached
often at Westbourne Park Methodist Church (where we went one Sunday during
S/69). Eric would urge us to have "The Australian in one hand, and the
Bible in the other". This was back in the early days of that newspaper,
when Rupert Murdoch was a newspaper-pioneer rather than an empire-ruler.
Eric really shook up Westbourne Park, a "cathedral church" of South
Australian Methodism, by publicly worrying about Australian foreign policy
re "the dark peoples" and the Vietnam War and so on.
Best wishes
See ya
Frank Bremner
_________________________________________________________________
Win petrol with drive.com.au 3 times each weekday!
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fad%2Eau%2Edoubleclick%2Enet%2Fclk%3B42319378%3B13690542%3Bk&_t=757220195&_m=EXT
More information about the Dialogue
mailing list