[Dialogue] Major Plutonium Study Eliminates Rationale for New Nuclear Weapons Push

Harry Wainwright h-wainwright at charter.net
Mon Dec 4 12:55:01 EST 2006


Union of Concerned Scientists
Citizens and Scientists for Environmental Solutions
www.ucsusa.org 




November 30, 2006

Major Plutonium Study Eliminates Rationale for New Nuclear Weapons Push


Statement by Dr. Lisbeth Gronlund, Co-Director, Global Security Program,
Union of Concerned Scientists 

"New findings on the aging of plutonium in nuclear warheads, which were
released today by the Department of Energy (DOE), demonstrate that current
warheads will remain dependable for many decades to come. This research
eliminates a major rationale for two DOE nuclear weapons initiatives: the
so-called Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) Program, under which all
current U.S. nuclear warheads would be replaced with newly designed warheads
over the next two to three decades; and the Complex 2030 proposal to rebuild
the U.S. nuclear weapons complex by 2030. 

"The plutonium aging studies released today find that the plutonium cores
(or pits) for nuclear weapons have minimum lifetimes of at least 85 years
and, in most cases, at least 100 years. DOE has previously argued that new
RRW warheads were necessary to address concerns about the potential
degradation in weapon performance over time due either to the aging of the
plutonium metal or to small changes resulting from the manufacturing process
if the plutonium pit was remanufactured to compensate for plutonium aging.
The studies make clear such concerns are unwarranted. 

"Under the RRW program, several different new warheads would be designed and
produced, and these would be fielded without nuclear explosive testing. The
Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories have each submitted
a new RRW design, and by the end of this year DOE is scheduled to choose one
of these for development and production. It is now clear that moving forward
with an RRW design is unnecessary.

"DOE's Complex 2030 proposal should also be put on hold, since it is
premised on the need to develop and produce several different types of RRWs.


"Rather than needing new nuclear weapons or a new weapons complex, the
United States needs a thorough review of its outdated nuclear weapons
policy. U.S. nuclear policy has experienced little change since the Cold War
and the United States still maintains thousands of nuclear weapons on high
alert. A full discussion of the purpose and structure of the U.S. nuclear
arsenal must precede any new investments in nuclear weapons."

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20061204/d1765f2b/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 1035 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20061204/d1765f2b/attachment.gif 


More information about the Dialogue mailing list