[Dialogue] Making Incompetence a Reality

Mon Jan 16 12:48:32 EST 2006

AlterNet

Making Incompetence a Reality

By Molly Ivins, AlterNet
Posted on January 12, 2006, Printed on January 16, 2006
http://www.alternet.org/story/30762/

Boy, you really can't take your eyes off this bunch for a minute, can you?
If they're not screwing up one thing, then they're screwing up another --
busy little beavers. And then there are the administrative nightmares they
have created all by themselves: The new Medicare prescription-drug benefit
is such a disaster area, four states took it over in less than a week just
to make sure poor people received their drugs.

Some of the press is starting to get the drill. Give us something like the
West Virginia coal mine disaster, and instead of standing around emoting
like Geraldo Rivera, a few reporters have enough sense to ask the obvious
question: What is this mine's safety record? And when it turns out to be
abysmal, a few more reporters have enough sense to ask: Who's in charge of
doing something after a mine gets 205 safety violations in one year? Where's
the Mine Safety and Health Administration? Who runs it? What's their
background -- are they professionals or mining industry stooges? Who's the
Michael "Heckuvajob" Brown in this outfit? Why are so many jobs at MSHA just
left completely unfilled? How much has MSHA's budget been cut since 2001 to
pay for tax cuts for the rich?

The great irony is that this was supposed to be the CEO administration. Bush
was supposed to put people in charge of government who had track records in
private industry, who did in fact know how to run a railroad. For just sheer
incompetence, this administration sets new records daily. All those years
the right wing sat around yammering about government incompetence, and it
took this administration to make it true.

But while the press is busy sort of figuring out what government needs to do
-- homeland security, anyone? -- other agencies are slipping quietly out of
control, with almost no attention paid. In the case of the Internal Revenue
Service, the problem appears to be more malice than incompetence.

Right-wing conspiracy theorists used to enjoy frightening themselves with
the possibility that the IRS would somehow become politicized and be used as
a tool by some nasty socialist like Jimmy Carter to go after their
ill-gotten gains stashed illegally offshore. Always seemed like a good plan
to me. Unfortunately, the only people who ever tried to politicize the IRS
were on the right -- first Richard Nixon and now George W. Bush.

Hundreds of thousands of poor Americans have had their tax refunds frozen
and their returns labeled fraudulent, according to the IRS's taxpayer
advocate, Nina Olson. Testifying before Congress this week, Olson said the
average income of these taxpayers is $13,000. Olson and her staff sampled
the suspected returns and found that, at most, one in five was questionable.

The poor citizens are seeking refunds under the Earned Income Tax Credit, a
Reagan program to help the working poor. The total possible tax fraud amount
involved in these returns is $9 billion -- compared to the $100 billion
problem with fraud by small businessmen who deal in cash. That's the kind of
shrewd administration we've come to expect from the Bushies. Olson points
out it is not only unfair, but also a waste of time. Meanwhile,
mind-boggling sums in taxes are being evaded by those at the other end of
the income scale.

David Cay Johnston, The New York Times' tax expert and author of "Perfectly
Legal," reports the IRS is now involved in an effort to cover up these very
kinds of incompetence that Olson demonstrated. "Records showing how
thoroughly the IRS audits big corporations and the rich, and how much it
discounts the additional taxes assessed after audits, are being withheld
from the public despite a 1976 court order requiring their disclosure,"
Johnston writes. In an episode reminiscent of the three stooges, the IRS
simply announced there was no court order.

This is, of course, part of a far wider and grimmer shutdown of information
about our government. Despite cheerful burbling from the president ("The
presumption ought to be that citizens ought to know as much as possible
about the government decision-making," he said last year), this
administration's love of secrecy is monumental. In fact, the cost of keeping
what our government does secret from the public has gone up alarmingly: The
classification system that cost $4.3 billion in fiscal year 2000 was up to
$7.2 billion in fiscal year 2004. That's a lot of Wite-Out.

Meanwhile, the IRS has also tracked the political affiliations of taxpayers
in 20 states. Its explanation is that the information was "routinely
collected by a vendor" and, of course, it made no use of it. And now the IRS
is planning to "outsource" collecting overdue taxes to private firms around
the country. Now, let's see, do we think any of those private firms will
have Republican Party affiliations? 

Molly Ivins writes about politics, Texas and other bizarre happenings. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20060116/4d3f8ec2/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 1542 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20060116/4d3f8ec2/attachment.gif