[Dialogue] A Capital Full of Shih Tzu Reporters

[Harry Wainwright]

Published on Thursday, May 11, 2006 by TruthDig <http://www.truthdig.com>  

A Capital Full of Shih Tzu Reporters 

by Molly Ivins 

As I occasionally survey the pack of sycophantic Shih Tzus* in the
Washington press corps, wriggling on their bellies to kiss the feet of those
in power, I feel plumb discouraged about the future of journalism. 

It's like a cross between Versailles under Louis XIV and high school:
obsequious courtiers flattering their way to favor, plus the silly cliques
of the "in crowd" and "out crowd." On the other hand, I am greatly cheered
by the young journalists in the blogosphere who have now whelped a perfect
litter of books worth paying attention to. 

For my marbles and chalk, the pick is David Sirota's "Hostile Takeover: How
Big Money and Corruption Conquered Our
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0307237346/commondreams-20/ref=nosim
/>  Government-and How We Take It Back." Sirota is a new-generation populist
who instinctively understands that the only real questions are "Who's
getting screwed?" and "Who's doing the screwing?" 

The extent to which corporate power has taken over the country and is
running the table cannot be exaggerated and must not be ignored. Sirota has
not only collected much new and useful information, he has put it into a
package that provides handy weapons to fight back. Si, se puede. 

Eric Boehlert, who writes for the online magazine Salon, has taken on the
MSM (mainstream media) and dipped it for ticks in his book, "
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0743289315/commondreams-20/ref=nosim
/> Lapdogs: How the Press Rolled Over for Bush." 

He recounts some breathtaking journalistic malfeasance-ignoring the Downing
Street memos, the Valerie Plame case and many others. As usual, sins of
omission dominate. The Washington press corps (which I think should be
separated from "normal" parts of the press) is breathtakingly craven. In the
face of intimidation and the lure of official approval, it has shown neither
courage nor enterprise. 

I don't know how to account for this pitiable performance. One hears
terrifying tales of when the press corps "turns," when it rips and attacks
like sharks in a feeding frenzy. Darn, not a shark in sight. The president's
approval ratings are at 31%, and not a single Shih Tzu will yap at him. 

Sometimes misunderstandings between bloggers and the MSM are the result of
simple ignorance. For example, there was the recent volley of disapproval
from bloggers about the MSM's failure to pay attention to comedian Stephen
Colbert's brilliant riff <http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0501-30.htm>
at the White House Correspondents Dinner. They weren't ignoring Colbert-as I
understand it, Colbert was the final speaker, and no paper can get much in
after 10 p.m. on Saturday night. Stories have to be written, edited and
printed, the presses roll and then the trucks roll. It's old media, kids-we
do not just punch a button at our shops. 

It seems to me both MSM and the blogosphere could benefit from reading the
new biography of Izzy Stone by Myra MacPherson, out in August. Because Izzy
was pretty much the perfect journalist, we can all learn from "
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684807130/commondreams-20/ref=nosim
/> All Governments Lie: The Life and Times of Rebel Journalist I.F. Stone."
What a pleasure! What a joy to read about the old dog on the hunt.
Surprising, too. While Stone famously broke story after story by actually
reading government documents instead of taking what the press was spoon-fed,
MacPherson reminds us he was also a shoe-leather reporter, who went out to
interviews, press conferences and the daily bash, where he occasionally
harassed spokesmen. 

Today, the bloggers seem to me to be breaking more toward opinion than
journalism, which I think is a shame. 

A noble exception is Josh Marshall's Talking Points Memo
<http://talkingpointsmemo.com/> , which is completely on top of its chosen
topics. Of course, Stone practiced opinion journalism, as do I, but with him
the hard reporting always came first. 

I have no objections to anyone breaking into the guild of journalism without
the credentials of journalism school or experience on a print daily (though
I highly recommend especially the latter). I do object to those who jump
from political hackery to flackery and expect respect. Truly, if you can't
cover a five-car pileup on Route 128, you should not be covering a
presidential campaign. 

The danger of the blogosphere is reading only those you agree with. While
there are right-wing blogs that are entertaining freak shows, it's hard to
find substantial journalism there. I hate to list bloggers I like because
I'm bound to leave out so many, but here goes: Daily Kos, Eschaton,
Altercation, Political Animal and Media Matters. 

* With apologies to those Shih Tzus with the hearts of lions. 

Molly Ivins is the former editor of the liberal monthly The Texas
<http://www.texasobserver.org/>  Observer. She is the bestselling author of
several books including Who Let the Dogs In?
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1400062853/commondreams-20/ref=nosim
/>  

C 2006 TruthDig.com, LLC

###

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20060512/49dc618d/attachment-0001.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 6731 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20060512/49dc618d/attachment-0001.gif