[Dialogue] Bush's Nuclear Apocalypse

Harry Wainwright h-wainwright at charter.net
Tue Oct 10 20:16:48 EST 2006



Published on Monday, October 9, 2006 by truthdig <http://www.truthdig.com>  

Bush's Nuclear Apocalypse 

by Chris Hedges

 

The aircraft carrier Eisenhower, accompanied by the guided-missile cruiser
USS Anzio, guided-missile destroyer USS Ramage, guided-missile destroyer USS
Mason and the fast-attack submarine USS Newport News, is, as I write, making
its way to the Straits of Hormuz off Iran.  The ships will be in place to
strike Iran by the end of the month.  It may be a bluff.  It may be a feint.
It may be a simple show of American power.  But I doubt it.  

War with Iran-a war that would unleash an apocalyptic scenario in the Middle
East-is probable by the end of the Bush administration.  It could begin in
as little as three weeks.  This administration, claiming to be anointed by a
Christian God to reshape the world, and especially the Middle East, defined
three states at the start of its reign as "the Axis of Evil." They were
Iraq, now occupied; North Korea, which, because it has nuclear weapons, is
untouchable; and Iran.  Those who do not take this apocalyptic rhetoric
seriously have ignored the twisted pathology of men like Elliott Abrams, who
helped orchestrate the disastrous and illegal contra war in Nicaragua, and
who now handles the Middle East for the National Security Council.  He knew
nothing about Central America.  He knows nothing about the Middle East.  He
sees the world through the childish, binary lens of good and evil, us and
them, the forces of darkness and the forces of light.  And it is this
strange, twilight mentality that now grips most of the civilian planners who
are barreling us towards a crisis of epic proportions.  

These men advocate a doctrine of permanent war, a doctrine which, as William
R. Polk points out, is a slight corruption of Leon Trotsky's doctrine of
permanent revolution.  These two revolutionary doctrines serve the same
function, to intimidate and destroy all those classified as foreign
opponents, to create permanent instability and fear and to silence domestic
critics who challenge leaders in a time of national crisis. It works.  The
citizens of the United States, slowly being stripped of their civil
liberties, are being herded sheep-like, once again, over a cliff.  

But this war will be different.  It will be catastrophic.  It will usher in
the apocalyptic nightmares spun out in the dark, fantastic visions of the
Christian right.  And there are those around the president who see this
vision as preordained by God; indeed, the president himself may hold such a
vision. 

The hypocrisy of this vaunted moral crusade is not lost on those in the
Middle East.  Iran actually signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  It
has violated a codicil of that treaty written by European foreign ministers,
but this codicil was never ratified by the Iranian parliament.  I do not
dispute Iran's intentions to acquire nuclear weapons nor do I minimize the
danger should it acquire them in the estimated five to 10 years.  But
contrast Iran with Pakistan, India and Israel.  These three countries
refused to sign the treaty and developed nuclear weapons programs in secret.
Israel now has an estimated 400 to 600 nuclear weapons.  The word "Dimona,"
the name of the city where the nuclear facilities are located in Israel, is
shorthand in the Muslim world for the deadly Israeli threat to Muslims'
existence.  What lessons did the Iranians learn from our Israeli, Pakistani
and Indian allies? 

Given that we are actively engaged in an effort to destabilize the Iranian
regime by recruiting tribal groups and ethnic minorities inside Iran to
rebel, given that we use apocalyptic rhetoric to describe what must be done
to the Iranian regime, given that other countries in the Middle East such as
Egypt and Saudi Arabia are making noises about developing a nuclear
capacity, and given that, with the touch of a button Israel could obliterate
Iran, what do we expect from the Iranians?  On top of this, the Iranian
regime grasps that the doctrine of permanent war entails making "preemptive"
and unprovoked strikes. 

Those in Washington who advocate this war, knowing as little about the
limitations and chaos of war as they do about the Middle East, believe they
can hit about 1,000 sites inside Iran to wipe out nuclear production and
cripple the 850,000-man Iranian army.  The disaster in southern Lebanon,
where the Israeli air campaign not only failed to break Hezbollah but united
most Lebanese behind the militant group, is dismissed.  These ideologues,
after all, do not live in a reality-based universe.  The massive Israeli
bombing of Lebanon failed to pacify 4 million Lebanese.  What will happen
when we begin to pound a country of 70 million people?  As retired General
Wesley K. Clark and others have pointed out, once you begin an air campaign
it is only a matter of time before you have to put troops on the ground or
accept defeat, as the Israelis had to do in Lebanon.  And if we begin
dropping bunker busters, cruise missiles and iron fragmentation bombs on
Iran this is the choice that must be faced-either sending American forces
into Iran to fight a protracted and futile guerrilla war or walking away in
humiliation. 

"As a people we are enormously forgetful," Dr. Polk, one of the country's
leading scholars on the Middle East, told an Oct. 13 gathering of the
Foreign Policy Association in New York.  "We should have learned from
history that foreign powers can't win guerrilla wars.  The British learned
this from our ancestors in the American Revolution and re-learned it in
Ireland.  Napoleon learned it in Spain.  The Germans learned it in
Yugoslavia.  We should have learned it in Vietnam and the Russians learned
it in Afghanistan and are learning it all over again in Chechnya and we are
learning it, of course, in Iraq.  Guerrilla wars are almost unwinnable.  As
a people we are also very vain.  Our way of life is the only way.  We should
have learned that the rich and powerful can't always succeed against the
poor and less powerful." 

An attack on Iran will ignite the Middle East.  The loss of Iranian oil,
coupled with Silkworm missile attacks by Iran on oil tankers in the Persian
Gulf, could send oil soaring to well over $110 a barrel.  The effect on the
domestic and world economy will be devastating, very possibly triggering a
huge, global depression.  The 2 million Shiites in Saudi Arabia, the Shiite
majority in Iraq and the Shiite communities in Bahrain, Pakistan and Turkey
will turn in rage on us and our dwindling allies.  We will see a combination
of increased terrorist attacks, including on American soil, and the
widespread sabotage of oil production in the Gulf.  Iraq, as bad as it looks
now, will become a death pit for American troops as Shiites and Sunnis, for
the first time, unite against their foreign occupiers. 

The country, however, that will pay the biggest price will be Israel.  And
the sad irony is that those planning this war think of themselves as allies
of the Jewish state.  A conflagration of this magnitude could see Israel
drawn back in Lebanon and sucked into a regional war, one that would over
time spell the final chapter in the Zionist experiment in the Middle East.
The Israelis aptly call their nuclear program "the Samson option." The
Biblical Samson ripped down the pillars of the temple and killed everyone
around him, along with himself. 

If you are sure you will be raptured into heaven, your clothes left behind
with the nonbelievers, then this news should cheer you up.  If you are
rational, however, these may be some of the last few weeks or months in
which to enjoy what is left of our beleaguered, dying republic and way of
life.  

Chris Hedges is the author of the bestselling and National Book Critics
Circle Award finalist, War is
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/1400034639?tag=commondreams-20/ref=nosim>  a Force
That Gives Us Meaning and What
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/0743255127?tag=commondreams-20/ref=nosim>  Every
Person Should Know about War. His newest book, Losing
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/0743255135?tag=commondreams-20/ref=nosim>  Moses
on the Freeway will be published in June 2005 by Free Press. 

Copyright C 2006 Truthdig, L.L.C. 

###

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20061010/c32151b3/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 6731 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20061010/c32151b3/attachment-0001.gif 


More information about the Dialogue mailing list