[Dialogue] Spong on Dallas and on torture
KroegerD at aol.com
KroegerD at aol.com
Wed Oct 18 17:05:35 EST 2006
October 18, 2006
Dallas, Texas: A New Vision
Dallas, Texas, has never been one of my favorite cities. Its image was
firmly set for me during the course of a single month in 1963, when two events
occurred that rocked this country. First, the American Ambassador to the United
Nations, Adlai E. Stevenson Jr., was booed, abused and spat upon by a Dallas
crowd while making a speech on the United Nations. Recent harsh, right-wing
editorials in its newspapers were considered responsible for inciting this
mentality among Dallas citizens. Within a month in this same city, that anger
struck again as President John F. Kennedy was assassinated. Dallas became for me
a city of hostility.
A decade later that negative image was enhanced when I was gathering material
to write the biography of my personal mentor and hero, John Elbridge Hines,
who had been Bishop of Texas prior to his election as Presiding Bishop of the
Episcopal Church (1964-1973). As his official biographer I had the privilege
of reading all of the correspondence sent to him and the press notices that
referred to him. The amount of vituperative rhetoric that he received from
Dallas citizens, and the stridently negative coverage of him in the Dallas
Morning News confirmed my less than positive feelings about that city.
Later in my days as a bishop, the leadership of the Episcopal Diocese of
Dallas, especially its one-time Suffragan Bishop Robert Terwilliger, kept the
Dallas negativity at full strength. Terwilliger was a consistently hostile voice
in our church as we sought to wrestle with the issues of a changing world.
He adamantly opposed the ordination of women to the priesthood and directed
constant and emotional energy against every liberalizing move the church made
in the seventies and eighties to bring justice and acceptance to gay and
lesbian people. None of these experiences served to counter my poor image of
Dallas.
Yet I could recall things long stored in my memory bank about Dallas that
were positive. When I was a child I was a Washington Senators baseball fan. The
Washington organization was the parent team of the Charlotte Hornets who
played in my hometown and to this team my childhood devotion was intense.
Charlotte Hornet players who made it to the big leagues, like Early Wynn, Al Evans,
Jake Early, Jim Bloodworth and Bobby Estalella, were my ultimate heroes. Most
did not stay with the Senators, but were traded or sold by this chronically
bad team to pay its bills. Finally poor crowds forced this team out of
Washington, first to Minneapolis-St. Paul to become the Minnesota Twins, and after
a second Washington team also failed, it was moved to Dallas to become the
Texas Rangers. I then transferred my affection to the Rangers and pulled for
this Dallas/Fort Worth team until I moved to Newark in 1976 and fell in love
with the Yankees of Reggie Jackson, Thurman Munson and Catfish Hunter. However,
for that brief time Dallas gained credibility and warmth inside my not
always objective psyche and served to temper my heretofore negative image.
Over the years these positive feelings began to grow as I accepted a number
of invitations to speak in this city. I lectured at Southern Methodist
University where an "adopted" son of mine named Chace Brinegar was a student, and
then at the Perkins Theological Seminary where the great theologian Schubert
Ogden was a respected and admired member of the faculty. I led a clergy
conference for the Methodists of the Dallas-Fort Worth area. I even engaged in a
printed debate in the Dallas Morning News with the current Episcopal Bishop of
Dallas, James Stanton, that I enjoyed, but I don't think he did. On three
different occasions, I spoke at the very unique Dallas Cathedral of Hope. On
three other occasions, I gave a series of lectures at the Unity Church of
Dallas. All of these were wonderful experiences and I began to develop a circle of
friends in that city who forced me to recognize that the monolithic negative
definition of any place is always inappropriate. Every city, indeed every
place, has within it both good and evil, things for which to be proud and things
for which to be ashamed.
I go into this personal history as a preamble to a recent experience in which
Christine and I spent five wonderful days in Dallas, that were as meaningful
as any time as I have ever known.
We arrived on a Friday and that evening and on Saturday night, we both
attended, along with some 400 people, two performances of the play "A Pebble in My
Shoe," written and directed by Los Angeles playwright Colin Cox. This play is
based on my autobiography, Here I Stand: My Struggle for a Christianity of
Integrity, Love and Equality. It has been floating around the country at
various venues since it opened in Los Angeles in late 2005. Dallas was the second
Texas city, after Austin, where it has been performed. Both nights the
audience was wonderfully responsive to this drama about the Church's struggle with
racism, sexism and homophobia.
On Sunday I spoke twice at the Cathedral of Hope to a combined audience of
some 1,300 people. Founded in 1973 as a worship community for homosexual
people, this church has had as its senior pastor for the past nineteen years, the
Rev. Michael Piazza, a gay Methodist minister of enormous talent. During his
tenure the Cathedral of Hope emerged as one of that city's largest
congregations with an online ministry that reaches 10,000 people a week. The multiple
Sunday worship services are augmented by a spectacular choir of some 40 - 50
voices and a marvelous full orchestra under the direction of Cynthia Brown.
Once they had a choral group calling itself "The Positive Singers," because all
of its singers were HIV positive. The new leader of this church is the Rev.
Dr. Jo Hudson, who has a graduate degree in Theology from Perkins and a PhD
from Texas A. & M. She was an ordained Methodist minister who was outed as a
lesbian and dismissed from her congregation. She found her ministry in this
incredible place where, along with Michael, she is universally loved and admired
and where her incredible talents are on full display. The Cathedral of Hope
was originally affiliated with the Metropolitan Community Church, a
denomination created by the Rev. Dr. Troy Perry specifically for the rejected
homosexual members of all churches that today has over 300,000 members around the
world. The Cathedral of Hope is at this moment negotiating to enter the
Christian Protestant mainstream by affiliating with the United Church of Christ. This
transition is symbolic of the transition going on in America as homophobia
dies and gay and lesbian people enter the life of full citizenship in both our
nation and our churches. Michael Piazza told me some years ago that at the
height of the AIDS epidemic, he was conducting as many as 20 to 25 funerals a
month, almost all of them for young males less than 40 years of age. I have
thought many times of how grateful I am to this church for giving its love and
pastoral care to so many who found the welcome of Christ lacking in the
churches in which they were raised.
As the service unfolded in that church on that Sunday morning, tears came to
my eyes as I watched worshipers come up as couples or as family groups to
receive communion. The acceptance accorded to so many who have endured so much
rejection was present in the joy and love on the faces of these gay and
lesbian people. Couples held hands, sometimes a gay son or lesbian daughter would
come to receive the sacrament accompanied both by their partners and their
parents. This was a church in which they could finally be openly together.
That afternoon, my wife and I accepted their invitation to ride in the back
of a Lincoln Town Car convertible as part of the Dallas Gay Pride Parade. On
that ride we received the love, cheers and applause of the thousands who lined
the streets along the parade route. We were announced at the various stops
along the way as the Episcopal bishop who had fought for the full acceptance
of homosexual people in the life of the church. The crowd waved, shouted and
called us by our names. It rained constantly during the parade on that open
convertible, but neither the rain nor a group of Bible-wielding counter
demonstrators could dim the joy of that day for us. The counter-demonstrators, with
voices screaming and faces contorted by anger promised us the fate of Sodom
and Gomorrah. I am always amazed at how the Bible, that portrays my Lord
embracing the outcasts, touching the lepers, welcoming the Samaritans, not
judging the woman taken in the act of adultery, and inviting "all of ye," not "some
of ye," to "come unto me," can, in the hands of a few distorted people be
turned into a book of hatred, violence and judgment.
The Dallas visit ended with a lecture delivered to a large audience of people
at the Unity Church of Dallas on Monday evening. The Unity Movement is a
branch of Christianity to which I have in recent years become deeply attracted,
as it quite self-consciously seeks to redefine the Christian faith outside
the categories of sin, guilt, rescue and control. Its theology begins in
Matthew Fox's concept of "Original Blessing" rather than with the traditional
concept of "Original Sin." It sees and encourages personal growth and the call to
full humanity. It proclaims a Christianity built on love and inclusion. It
affirms each person as he or she is and then seeks to provide both the
community and the resources to help that person grow into being all that he or she
can be. Unity sees Christianity as a religion of acceptance not judgment, of
expanding life not controlling behavior. The Unity movement contains much of
what I believe will mark the Christian Church of the future.
Christine and I flew home on Tuesday with the smiles of those who have been
in the presence of the Holy. We also came away with warm new feelings about
the city of Dallas. Is it possible that the Kingdom of God might be dawning in
Texas? God does move in mysterious ways, doesn't she?
John Shelby Spong
_Note from the Editor: Bishop Spong's new book is available now at
bookstores everywhere and by clicking here!_
(http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060762055/agoramedia-20)
Question and Answer
With John Shelby Spong
Several weeks ago I solicited reader comments on a letter from Graeme Moore
on torture. I promised to print the responses in place of the regular
question and answer feature to my column. The letters below are a fulfillment of
that promise. Thanks to all of you for your participation in this debate.
John Shelby Spong
Gerald Nordstrom from Minneapolis, MN, writes:
Graeme Moore is correct in saying that torture or any defense of it violates
the Golden Rule. Failure to observe this rule accounts for cruelty and
dishonesty of all kinds - the effluence of self-centeredness, the core of all
evil. By contrast and at the heart of the Golden Rule are empathy, kindness,
generosity, and forgiveness.
Too many born-again Bible-worshipers brush the Golden Rule aside, disinclined
to do the soul-searching necessary for following it. Preferring commandments
easier to follow, they proudly come out against abortion, stem-cell
research, gay marriage, etc., and then comfortably give ignoble support for
preemptive violence, presumptuous dominance, and torture.
As to why liberals do not move against the President's defense of these
things, liberals are characteristically laissez-faire, and their tolerance has
dangerously allowed Bush too much rope - though there is hope it will be pulled
back smartly in the coming election.
Gladys M. Peckham from Bradenton, FL, writes:
These are the same people who advocate war as an answer to world problems.
There are no faces in war, not even our own troops. It is simply the good guys
and bad guys. Us versus them, and them is always wrong. It takes too much
trouble to work things out by listening and respect. Seems we are back in the
wild west, no value in people, just land.
John Backus via the Internet writes:
I come from a family whose past (before my parents) was very violent. My
mother, in a fearful time of our life, once told me (before I was a teenager)
that if someone were to ask me a question, and then start breaking my fingers -
I must never answer - because I was already dead, but just didn't know it
yet. And if I absolutely had to speak, I must lie - and lie in such a way that I
take "one of them" with me.
I not only believe that any form of torture is beneath us - but it is
demonstrably counter productive. I have witnessed it in my country, and it was what
I was taught in my own family. Those days are long gone - all those folk,
and my parents, are dead. But the memory of that conversation lingers strong.
Alan via the internet (jepysdad) writes:
As Mr. Moore from Canada wrote and you so accurately nailed in your "Small
Leaders in a New Dark Age" column there appears to be no political price for
our leaders to wander naked down the street in the parade. Sure a few of us are
pointed at the horror of two old rich white men in their sagging birthday
suits, but most cheer them on cause they wear the crown. I did a piece on my
blog about torture being a new family value. It is below. Peace, Alan
New Family Value, Torture!
Apparently listening to sermons preaching fire and brimstone isn't torturous
enough. Family values means more than just imaging the damning lake of fire,
it entails ensuring Biblical level suffering is inflicted upon infidels. The
techniques have been updated for our century. Rather than dunk suspected
evildoers in the closest river or lake, modern day plumbing enables the drowning
to occur inside a jail cell.
Two techniques approximate a winter time dunking in the Elizabeth River. One,
the prisoner is kept naked in a 50 degree cell and splashed with cold water
for days at a time. The second is called waterboarding, where the prisoners
only think they are drowning. Really they are just suffocating due to plastic
wrap over their face while water splashed over them.
Groups endorsing these practices include the Family Research Council and The
Traditional Values Coalition. Apparently these are common adolescent behavior
modification practices in the Biblical family known for treating others the
way they wish to be treated. Leaders of both groups implied those blocking
the President's plan to use coercive techniques and testimony, hearsay, and
restrict access to evidence will pay the political price.
"Maverick status is looked upon as a strength in Congress, but a maverick in
the White House is not looked upon with great admiration from our folks,"
Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, said Monday.
"Politically, this isn't wise," added the Rev. Louis Sheldon, chairman of the
Traditional Values Coalition, which supports the president's call for
Congress to approve touch interrogation techniques for terrorism suspects.
Tony Perkins and Rev. Sheldon likely desire the day any God fearing Christian
can simply shout "This person is possessed" and the might of governmental
power descends upon the innocent victim. Yes, bring back the use of hearsay
that saw many innocents in America's early history exterminated for crop
failures and violent storms.
Yet, there is no price for government failure.
D. A. Taylor via the Internet writes:
I agree with Mr. Moore that leadership must find its voice in this horrendous
spectacle of Mr. Bush using and manipulating torture to further ends of war.
Where are the Jerry Falwells, the Oral Roberts, The Billy Grahams, the Pat
Robertsons and Shulers of the Christian world? Or are they extremists similar
to the Imans and clerics who burn churches and effigies in the name of peace
loving and tolerant Islam? I guess I know the answer to that part of the
established Christian leadership and that it exposes their hypocrisy for its
enormity. At the same time, leaders of the main line denominations like United
Methodists, Jews, Catholics, Baptists, etc. should all be stepping up to the
podium to speak clearly of Christian values and how they are against the
behavior being shown by the born again Mr. Bush, a self professed Christian
disciple. To hear Mr. Bush puzzle over what is meant by "outrages upon human
dignity". As John Spong relates, this puzzle is a smokescreen that seeks to hide the
fact that outrageous things have already been done and condoned by the
leadership.
I have seen the documentary called Guantanamo and it makes me sick in its
portrayal of the abuse and inhumane treatment of political prisoners at the
hands of Americans and British. Canada's Mayar Arar is only the tip of the
iceberg in what has happened in the American-led Western World in the last 6
years. It is truly appalling.
Rob Hirschman from Saginaw, MI, writes:
The honest answer is that many Christians support torture because they supp
ort George W. Bush and his so called war on terror. These are the people that
continue to say Saddam was involved in 9-11 and that we are doing God's will
by liberating the people of Iraq no matter how many of them get killed along
the way. Facts mean nothing to these people who honestly believe God is on
their side. The foundation of their belief is that they and they alone know the
truth about God and everything concerning God. These people have no room for
doubt or open thought because it makes them uncomfortable even to consider
the possibility that they might be wrong. The world is black and white to them
with no shades of grey. They pick and choose which part of the scripture to
follow. It is like eating at a buffet. The bottom line with them is that only
Christians have real truth and to hell with everyone else figuratively and
literally.
Dr. Sharon Gilliland from Indianapolis, IN, writes:
I completely agree with Graeme Moore's comments about Christians and torture.
I feel strongly that torture is wrong. I feel appalled to realize that my
feelings and opinions are not shared by those who have power in this country. I
am ashamed to be an American and wish I could easily move my allegiance to
another country. I feel powerless to effect any change in those who rule this
country.
John Kenyon from Silver Spring, MD, writes:
Regarding the recent letter writer's question about the failure of Christians
to stand up against torture, I think it is much like anything else: we only
notice the thing that "sticks out" (Erich Fromm's term) and not that which is
already doing as it ought. We committed Christians, not necessarily aligned
with any specific sect or organization, are raising Holy Hell about this
issue, and we will continue to make a loud noise and will walk the walk as well
as talk. I would go so far as to say that those who oppose man's inhumanity to
man, regardless of the banner beneath which they do so, are all acting in
the spirit of Christ and therefore may be considered Christians (even if some
of them might be offended by the appellation).
This is about as succinct as I ever get. Thanks for your ongoing good work.
We are with you, and we are many.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20061018/1df93a78/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Dialogue
mailing list