[Dialogue] Guernica

[Ed Reames]

ORID model

Objective
Reflective
Interpretive
Decisional

Here is an article from a web site describing the development of the 
model by the ICA.  The article mentions TOP also.

http://www.processworkmidwest.org/writings/pwarticle

Regards,

Ed Reames
La Rivera de Belen
Costa Rica
72 degrees F and cloudy



David Walters wrote:
> Wasn't a fourth section called theological or decisional?
>  
> David Walters
>
>     *_Shirley Heckman Snelling transferred the old manual into text. 
>     This is the page on _*
>     *__* 
>     *_GUERNICA_*
>     * *
>     *_Introduction_:  The Church and the use of art.*
>     *             No Christian art*
>     *          Liturgical art*
>     *          What is good art?*
>     *          Experience your experience*
>     *          Revolutionary role in civilization*
>     *          How to discuss art:*
>     *             Don't ask artist what it means*
>     *          Trialogue - you, I, painting*
>     * *
>     *_Questions_: Order your questions very carefully in the following
>     pattern in order that a progression in consciousness takes place.*
>     *            Suggested questions which might be used (not meant to
>     be exhaustive):*
>     * *
>     *      1.  _Impressionistic:_ Immediate raw data of the art form.*
>     *          What object do you notice?  (varieties of same:
>     animate, inanimate, shapes)*
>     *          What color do you see?*
>     * *
>     *      2.  _Reflective_:  Personal relation with the data of the
>     art form.*
>     *          What color would you add (where?)   Take out?   Same
>     for objects.*
>     *          What music would you play as background to this art form?*
>     *          What noise do you hear coming from the painting?  Make
>     the noise.  (Often, if individuals are reluctant to do so, group
>     can be divided and make all the noises suggested at one time.)*
>     *          How would you divide the painting into two parts.- 
>     Which part keep?*
>     *          How does this art form make you feel?  What emotion? *
>     *          Where would you hang this painting in your home?*
>     *          What is the group's willingness to live with the painting?*
>     * *
>     *      3.  _Interpretive, cultural_:  Association of personal
>     relations to the art form with*
>     *                     ordinary life content.*
>     *          What story would you tell about this painting?*
>     *          What has happened here?  What is going on here?*
>     *          What word is coming out of the picture?*
>     *          Where do you see this going on in your life?*
>     *          What Word would you say to the painting?*
>     * *
>     *_Conclusion_: Call attention to the fact that this conversation
>     has had to do with their lives.  Tell story of the painting.*
>     * *
>     *            _Purpose_:      To engage the group in an authentic
>     reflection upon the suffering of their own lives and their
>     relationship with it.  To effect a corporate presence to the
>     dimension of selfhood.*
>
>     */Patricia Tuecke <ptuecke at charter.net>/* wrote:
>
>         I have a colleague interested in using Guernica as an art form
>         to demonstrate the focused conversation method in a group and
>         is working on the questions.
>          
>         I'm curious if any of you have our original Guernica
>         conversation.  It may be on the Golden Pathways, but my CD
>         drive isn't working. To my regret, my RS-1 files were lost
>         years ago. I remember the "Where do you see this going on  -
>         in your community/neighborhood & in your own life" questions.
>          
>         I'm curious to see how it compares to a "generic" art
>         form//focused conversation on a piece of art.
>          
>         I expect that after the Virginia Tech tragedy, it could be an
>         appropriate conversation -- at least a memorable one.  
>          
>         If you can send me the questions or point me in the right
>         direction, I'd appreciate it.
>          
>         Thanks,
>         Pat
>          
>          
>         Patricia Tuecke, Sierra Circle Consulting
>         775-333-6998   ptuecke at charter.net <mailto:ptuecke at charter.net>
>         Contributor to:**  **
>         **     ****Participation Works!,** Ch. 5
>         **     Discovering Common Ground, Ch. 25**
>         **     IAF Handbook of Facilitation,** Ch. 5
>          
>         _______________________________________________
>         Dialogue mailing list
>         Dialogue at wedgeblade.net
>         http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/dialogue_wedgeblade.net
>
>
>
>
>     401 North Beverly Way
>     Tolleson, Arizona 85353-2401
>     +1 623-936-8671
>     +1 623-363-3277
>     jfwiegel at yahoo.com
>
>     Now and then it's good to pause in the pursuit of happiness and
>     just be happy. Guillaume Apollinaire
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
>     Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
>     <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48245/*http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_ylc=X3oDMTE1YW1jcXJ2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3LWNhcnM->
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     _______________________________________________
>     Dialogue mailing list
>     Dialogue at wedgeblade.net
>     http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/dialogue_wedgeblade.net
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dialogue mailing list
> Dialogue at wedgeblade.net
> http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/dialogue_wedgeblade.net
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20070419/bcce0fcc/attachment-0001.html