[Dialogue] Secondary Ethics

[Marilyn R Crocker]

To: dialogue at wedgeblade.net
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:07:58 -0400
Subject: Re: [Dialogue] {Disarmed} Re:  Secondary Ethics

Dick et al,

My understanding of "secondary" integrity (as opposed to the rules, regs
and legalisms that,for me, represent "primary" integrity) is that which
guides one's actions in accord with the "necessary deed" -- the freely
responsible action (cf Bonhoeffer) which I've never found is a simplistic
cop out, but rather the result of complex, prayer filled discernment.

I would be interested to know more about your thinking, Dick, that led
you to conclude this was our movement's most serious perversion.

With appreciation for the resources you bring to our "virtual" collegium
room table,

Marilyn

Marilyn R. Crocker, Ed.D
Crocker & Associates, Inc.
123 Sanborn Road
West Newfield, ME 04095
(207) 793-3711


On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:23:34 EDT KroegerD at aol.com writes:


Here is a link to the subject not from the spirit movement.
http://ezinearticles.com/?A-Model-of-Ethics-for-Womens-Development&id=654
252

On golden pathways a google search delivered only a speech by Mathews in
Korea.  ( below )

good luck with that!!

In my words, secondary integrity means doing whatever is necessary,
telling story ( even if it is totally untrue) in order to ger 'er done. 
In my opinion, it was our movement's most serious perversion, and
ultimately did in the spirit movement as an organization.

Dick Kroeger

Global Priors Council 
e all-new MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from
"discover.aol.com" claiming to be AOL.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20070822/c8c26891/attachment.html