[Dialogue] ENERGY DEPLETION
LAURELCG at aol.com
LAURELCG at aol.com
Tue Jan 30 20:43:30 EST 2007
In a message dated 1/29/07 8:33:43 PM, FacilitationFla at aol.com writes:
<< I understand that the Democrat governor of Montana is serious about
finding
ways to extract coal -- which would serve the US for the next 60 years,
without putting CO2 or other gases into the environment. The technology is
almost
there and he is keen to find a way to use it. >>
Cynthia, This is from a D.Min. colleague. Jann
Unfortunately, this vision is not so "green" as it purports to be. The
emissions resulting from coal use are only one part of the problem. Another
serious consideration is the process of mining itself. Like all mining, the
mining
of coal involves toxic-runoff, pollution, etc. In the Appalachian area just
west of where I live, a recent change in mining technology has led to even
greater environmental destruction. Mining companies are literally blasting
the
tops off the oldest mountains in the world & dumping the contaminated rubble
into neighboring valleys. Whole ecosystems & watersheds are being destroyed.
This is called "mountaintop removal"-- and, no matter what some
fundamentalist
executives may claim, I don't think it's what Isaiah had in mind when he
wrote
(40:4) "Every valley shall be lifted up, and every mountain and hill be made
low; and the rough places a plain."
If you are not familiar with this method of coal extraction, please check out
the following websites:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountaintop_removal (general information)
http://www.ohvec.org/galleries/mountaintop_removal/ (photos)
http://www.oriononline.org/pages/om/06-1om/Reece.html (personal description &
activist response)
In any case, even the optimistic Governor Schweitzer says that the use of
Montana's coal is only [my word] "enough to replace all our imported oil for
60
years." In other words, it's just a way to delay our (and Earth's) recovery
from our addiction to an extractive economy based on consumption.
If anyone is not perfectly clear about why we need to make radical [i.e.,
root] changes in our outlook, I recommend The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight:
The
Fate of the World and What We Can Do Before Its Too Late by Thom Hartmann--a
book that was required reading for Apela Colorado's "Indigenous Mind"
Intensive in October. As Einstein said, " We can't solve problems by using
the same
kind of thinking we used to create them." I don't want to knock technology
--
I love my indoor plumbing, I use a car & a computer, and antibiotics have
saved my life. Still, how likely is it that a "techno-fix" will save us from
the
problems created by our romance with technology? I've read that most
technological research is focused on overcoming problems created by earlier
technology. What do we really need if we are going to "re-invent" the human,
as Berry &
Swimme suggest? How will we translate "wisdom" into a political program?
"In my dream, the angel shrugged & said,
If we fail this time it will be a failure of imagination.
& then she place the world gently in the palm of my hand."
-- Brian Andreas
With love & blessings in this season of returning light,
Margery
More information about the Dialogue
mailing list