[Dialogue] Private Contractors Outnumber US Troops in Iraq

[Harry Wainwright]

Published on Wednesday, July 4, 2007 by the Los Angeles Times
<http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-na-private4jul04,1,656431
6.story?ctrack=1&cset=true>  

Private Contractors Outnumber US Troops in Iraq

by T. Christian Miller

The number of U.S.-paid private contractors in Iraq now exceeds that of
American combat troops, newly released figures show, raising fresh questions
about the privatization of the war effort and the government's capacity to
carry out military and rebuilding campaigns.

More than 180,000 civilians - including Americans, foreigners and Iraqis -
are working in Iraq under U.S. contracts, according to State and Defense
department figures obtained by the Los Angeles Times.

 <http://www.commondreams.org/archive/wp-content/photos/0704_01.jpg>
Including the recent troop buildup, 160,000 soldiers and a few thousand
civilian government employees are stationed in Iraq.

The total number of private contractors, far higher than previously
reported, shows how heavily the Bush administration has relied on
corporations to carry out the occupation of Iraq - a mission criticized as
being undermanned.

"These numbers are big," said Peter Singer, a Brookings Institution scholar
who has written on military contracting. "They illustrate better than
anything that we went in without enough troops. This is not the coalition of
the willing. It's the coalition of the billing."

The numbers include at least 21,000 Americans, 43,000 foreign contractors
and about 118,000 Iraqis - all employed in Iraq by U.S. tax dollars,
according to the most recent government data.

The array of private workers promises to be a factor in debates on a range
of policy issues, including the privatization of military jobs and the
number of Iraqi refugees allowed to resettle in the U.S.

But there are also signs that even those mounting numbers may not capture
the full picture. Private security contractors, who are hired to protect
government officials and buildings, were not fully counted in the survey,
according to industry and government officials.

Continuing uncertainty over the numbers of armed contractors drew special
criticism from military experts.

"We don't have control of all the coalition guns in Iraq. That's dangerous
for our country," said William Nash, a retired Army general and
reconstruction expert. The Pentagon "is hiring guns. You can rationalize it
all you want, but that's obscene."

Although private companies have played a role in conflicts since the
American Revolution, the U.S. has relied more on contractors in Iraq than in
any other war, according to military experts.

Contractors perform functions including construction, security and weapons
system maintenance.

Military officials say contractors cut costs while allowing troops to focus
on fighting rather than on other tasks.

"The only reason we have contractors is to support the war fighter," said
Gary Motsek, the assistant deputy undersecretary of Defense who oversees
contractors. "Fundamentally, they're supporting the mission as required."

But critics worry that troops and their missions could be jeopardized if
contractors, functioning outside the military's command and control, refuse
to make deliveries of vital supplies under fire.

At one point in 2004, for example, U.S. forces were put on food rations when
drivers balked at taking supplies into a combat zone.

Adding an element of potential confusion, no single agency keeps track of
the number or location of contractors.

In response to demands from Congress, the U.S. Central Command began a
census last year of the number of contractors working on U.S. and Iraqi
bases to determine how much food, water and shelter was needed.

That census, provided to The Times under the Freedom of Information Act,
shows about 130,000 contractors and subcontractors of different
nationalities working at U.S. and Iraqi military bases.

However, U.S. military officials acknowledged that the census did not
include other government agencies, including the U.S. Agency for
International Development and the State Department.

Last month, USAID reported about 53,000 Iraqis employed under U.S.
reconstruction contracts, doing jobs such as garbage pickup and helping to
teach democracy. In interviews, agency officials said an additional 300
Americans and foreigners worked as contractors for the agency.

State Department officials said they could not provide the department's
number of contractors. Of about 5,000 people affiliated with the U.S.
Embassy in Iraq, about 300 are State Department employees. The rest are a
mix of other government agency workers and contractors, many of whom are
building the new embassy.

"There are very few of us, and we're way undermanned," said one State
Department official who spoke on condition of anonymity. "We have
significant shortages of people. It's been that way since before [the war],
and it's still that way."

The companies with the largest number of employees are foreign firms in the
Middle East that subcontract to KBR, the Houston-based oil services company,
according to the Central Command database. KBR, once a subsidiary of
Halliburton Co., provides logistics support to troops, the single largest
contract in Iraq.

Middle Eastern companies, including Kulak Construction Co. of Turkey and
Projects International of Dubai, supply labor from Third World countries to
KBR and other U.S. companies for menial work on U.S. bases and rebuilding
projects. Foreigners are used instead of Iraqis because of fears that
insurgents could infiltrate projects.

KBR is by far the largest employer of Americans, with nearly 14,000 U.S.
workers. Other large employers of Americans in Iraq include New York-based
L-3 Communications, which holds a contract to provide translators to troops,
and ITT Corp., a New York engineering and technology firm.

The most controversial contractors are those working for private security
companies, including Blackwater, Triple Canopy and Erinys. They guard
sensitive sites and provide protection to U.S. and Iraqi government
officials and businessmen.

Security contractors draw some of the sharpest criticism, much of it from
military policy experts who say their jobs should be done by the military.
On several occasions, heavily armed private contractors have engaged in
firefights when attacked by Iraqi insurgents.

Others worry that the private security contractors lack accountability.
Although scores of troops have been prosecuted for serious crimes, only a
handful of private security contractors have faced legal charges.

The number of private security contractors in Iraq remains unclear, despite
Central Command's latest census. The Times identified 21 security companies
in the Central Command database, deploying 10,800 men.

However, the Defense Department's Motsek, who monitors contractors, said the
Pentagon estimated the total was 6,000.

Both figures are far below the private security industry's own estimate of
about 30,000 private security contractors working for government agencies,
nonprofit organizations, media outlets and businesses.

Industry officials said that private security companies helped reduce the
number of troops needed in Iraq and provided jobs to Iraqis - a benefit in a
country with high unemployment.

"A guy who is working for a [private security company] is not out on the
street doing something inimical to our interests," said Lawrence Peter,
director of the Private Security Company Assn. of Iraq.

Not surprisingly, Iraqis make up the largest number of civilian employees
under U.S. contracts. Typically, the government contracts with an American
firm, which then subcontracts with an Iraqi firm to do the job.

Stan Soloway, president of the Professional Services Council, a contractors'
trade group, said the number of Iraqis reflected the importance of the
reconstruction and economic development efforts to the overall U.S. mission
in Iraq.

"That's not work that the government does or has ever done.. That's work
that is going to be done by companies and to some extent by" nongovernmental
organizations, Soloway said. "People tend to think that these are
contractors on the battlefield, and they're not."

The Iraqis have been the most difficult to track. As recently as May, the
Pentagon told Congress that 22,000 Iraqis were employed by its contractors.
But the Pentagon number recently jumped to 65,000 - a result of closer
inspection of contracts, an official said.

The total number of Iraqis employed under U.S. contracts is important, in
part because it may influence debate in Congress regarding how many Iraqis
will be allowed to come to the U.S. to escape violence in their homeland.

This year, the U.S. planned to cap that number at 7,000 a year. To date,
however, only a few dozen Iraqis have been admitted, according to State
Department figures.

Kirk Johnson, head of the List Project, which seeks to increase the
admission of Iraqis, said that the U.S. needed to provide a haven to those
who worked most closely with American officials.

"We all say we are grateful to these Iraqis," Johnson said. "How can we be
the only superpower in the world that can't implement what we recognize as a
moral imperative?"

The back story

Information in this article is based in part on a database of contractors in
Iraq obtained by The Times under the Freedom of Information Act, which
allows the public access to government records.

The database is the result of a census conducted earlier this year by the
U.S. Central Command.

The census found about 130,000 contractors working for 632 companies holding
contracts in Iraq with the Defense Department and a handful of other federal
agencies.

The Times received the database last month, four months after first
requesting it. Because the Freedom of Information Act law requires an agency
to provide only information as of the date of the request, the census is
based on figures as of February. During interviews, Pentagon officials said
the census had since been updated, and they provided additional figures
based on the update.

Contractors in Iraq

There are more U.S.-paid private contractors than there are American combat
troops in Iraq.

Contractors: 180,000

U.S. troops: 160,000

-

Nationality of contractors*

118,000 Iraqis

43,000 non-U.S. foreigners

21,000 Americans

Top contractors

Company: Kulak Construction Co.

Description: Based in Turkey, supplies construction workers to U.S. bases

Total employees: 30,301

-

Company: KBR

Description: Based in Houston, supplies logistics support to U.S. troops

Total employees: 15,336

-

Company: Prime Projects International

Description: Based in Dubai, supplies labor for logistics support

Total employees: 10,560

-

Company: L-3 Communications

Description: Based in New York, provides translators and other services

Total employees: 5,886

-

Company: Gulf Catering Co.

Description: Based in Saudi Arabia, provides kitchen services to U.S. troops

Total employees: 4,002

-

Company: 77 Construction

Description: Based in Irbil, Iraq, provides logistics support to troops

Total employees: 3,219

-

Company: ECC

Description: Based in Burlingame, Calif, works on reconstruction projects

Total employees: 2,390

-

Company: Serka Group

Description: Based in Turkey, supplies logistics support to U.S. bases

Total employees: 2,250

-

Company: IPBD Ltd.

Description: Based in England, supplies labor, laundry services and other
support

Total employees: 2,164

-

Company: Daoud & Partners Co.

Description: Based in Amman, Jordan, supplies labor for logistics support

Total employees: 2,092

-

Company: EOD Technology Inc

Description: Based in Lenoir City, Tenn., supplies security, explosives
demolition and other services

Total employees: 1,913

-

Note: Data are as of February, which is most current available.

*Approximate - numbers rounded

Sources: U.S. Central Command, Times reporting

Paul Duginski Los Angeles Times

Copyright 2007 Los Angeles Times

Article printed from www.CommonDreams.org 

URL to article: http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/07/04/2284/

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20070704/d461128a/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 6731 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20070704/d461128a/attachment-0001.gif