[Dialogue] {Spam?} Millions More for a Failed Anti-Drug Propaganda Campaign? Ridiculous!

Fri Mar 16 12:49:35 EDT 2007

AlterNet

Millions More for a Failed Anti-Drug Propaganda Campaign? Ridiculous!

By Paul Armentano, AlterNet
Posted on March 16, 2007, Printed on March 16, 2007
http://www.alternet.org/story/49231/

Indiana House Republican Mark Souder, a White House point man in Congress
for its propaganda war against drugs, recently took to the airwaves to
defend one of the Bush administration's sacred cows: its National Youth
Anti-Drug Media Campaign.

If you've had access to a television or a newspaper over the past few years,
you're probably familiar with the federal ad campaign. It's the one that's
spent over $2 billion since 1998 to produce public-service announcements
implying that smoking pot supports al-Qaida and may make you pregnant, among
other dubious anti-drug messages. So dubious, in fact, that the campaign has
flopped miserably among its target audience. Of course, this fact matters
not to the White House, which recently demanded $130 million to run the ads
through 2008 -- a 31 percent increase over current funding levels.

Speaking recently with MSNBC's Tucker Carlson, Souder vehemently defended
the administration's decision to increase spending for the much-maligned
campaign, stating, "The fact is, I believe in results and conservatives
believe in results." That said, the results couldn't be any worse.

Consider this:

*	A 2002 review by the research firm Westat Inc. and the Annenberg
Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania found "no
statistically significant decline in marijuana use or improvement in beliefs
and attitudes about marijuana use" attributable to the media campaign.
Authors of the report -- which was sponsored by the federal government --
later told Congress that the negative results were among the worst in the
history of large-scale public communication campaigns. 
*	A 2003 performance assessment by the White House Office of
Management and Budget criticized the Media Campaign for failing to achieve
any tangible goals or objectives. There exists "no evidence that paid media
messages have a direct effect on youth drug-related behavior," the report
concluded. 
*	An August Government Accountability Office (GAO) evaluation
reported: "[E]xposure to the advertisements generally did not lead youth to
disapprove of using drugs and may have promoted perceptions among exposed
youth that others' drug use was normal. ... [E]xposure to the campaign did
not prevent initiation of marijuana use and had no effect on curtailing
current users' marijuana use." 
*	A January Texas State University study published in the journal
Addictive Behaviors reported that teens are more likely to express their
intent to use marijuana after viewing the Feds' anti-pot ads. Investigators
concluded, "It appears that ... anti-marijuana public statement
announcements used in national anti-drug campaigns in the U.S. produce
immediate effects opposite [of those] intended by the creators of the
campaign." 

Souder's response? "Just because some study comes to some conclusion that
the liberals doing the study wanted to have, doesn't mean the study is
accurate. Results are results."

Indeed. And in this case, the results are in. There is nothing to be gained
by exaggerating claims of marijuana's alleged harms. (In the same MSNBC
interview, Souder claimed -- falsely -- that thousands of Americans die
every year from the occasional toke.) On the contrary, by overstating pot's
potential dangers, America's policymakers and law enforcement community
undermine their credibility and ability to effectively educate the public of
the risks that may be associated with cannabis or with more dangerous drugs.
This is the reason why the Feds' multibillion dollar media campaign, and the
government's drug 'war' efforts overall, have consistently fizzled.

Rather than continue down this failed path, federal officials like Rep.
Souder ought to take a page from the government's far more successful
campaigns discouraging drunken driving and teen tobacco smoking, both of
which have fallen dramatically since the mid-1990s. America has not achieved
these results by arbitrarily outlawing the use of alcohol or tobacco, or by
targeting and arresting adults who use these products responsibly, but
through honest, health- and science-based education campaigns.

Until we as a nation apply these same principles to our educational efforts
regarding cannabis, there will be little change in either teens' perceptions
of pot or their patterns of marijuana use, regardless of how much money
Souder and Congress spend.

An earlier version of this article appeared in the Fort Wayne News-Sentinel.

Paul Armentano <mailto:paul at norml.org>  is the senior policy analyst for the
NORML Foundation in Washington, DC. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20070316/f6cf5381/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 1533 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20070316/f6cf5381/attachment.gif 