[Dialogue] Iraqis Resist U.S. Pressure to Enact Oil Law

[Harry Wainwright]

Published on Sunday, May 13, 2007 by the Los Angeles Times
<http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-fg-oil13may13,1,829289.st
ory?coll=la-headlines-frontpage>  

Iraqis Resist U.S. Pressure to Enact Oil Law

by Tina Susman

BAGHDAD - It has not even reached parliament, but the oil law that U.S.
officials call vital to ending Iraq's civil war is in serious trouble among
Iraqi lawmakers, many of whom see it as a sloppy document rushed forward to
satisfy Washington's clock.

Opposition ranges from vehement to measured, but two things are clear: The
May deadline that the White House had been banking on is in doubt. And even
if the law is passed, it fails to resolve key issues, including how to
divide Iraq's oil revenue among its Shiite, Kurdish and Sunni regions, and
how much foreign investment to allow. Those questions would be put off for
future debates.
<http://www.commondreams.org/archive/wp-content/photos/0513_01.jpg> 

The problems of the oil bill bode poorly for the other so-called benchmarks
that the Bush administration has been pressuring Prime Minister Nouri
Maliki's government to meet. Those include provincial elections, reversing a
prohibition against former Baath Party members holding government and
military positions and revision of Iraq's constitution.

Republican leaders in Washington have warned administration officials that
if the Iraqi government fails to meet those benchmarks by the end of the
summer, remaining congressional support for Bush's Iraq policies could
crumble. Their impatience was underscored Wednesday by Vice President Dick
Cheney during a visit here.

"I did make it clear that we believe it's very important to move on the
issues before us in a timely fashion, and that any undue delay would be
difficult to explain," Cheney told reporters.

But Iraqi lawmakers show little sign of bending to accommodate Bush on an
issue as crucial as oil.

"We have two clocks - the Baghdad clock and the Washington clock - and this
is a perfect example," said Mahmoud Othman, a lawmaker from the
semiautonomous Kurdish region of northern Iraq. "This has always been the
case. Washington has been pushing the Iraqis to do things to fit their
agenda."

Iraq is believed to have some of the world's largest oil reserves, about 115
billion barrels. The country's 2007 budget is based on predictions that oil
proceeds will reach $31 billion, 93% of the government's revenue.

But war and political instability have kept production down. Just before the
U.S.-led invasion in March 2003, production was 2.6 million barrels per day.
U.S. officials predicted a rapid rise to 3 million barrels. Instead, Iraq
often has struggled to push the daily total to 2 million barrels because of
obsolete equipment and security problems.

The oil law is supposed to change this by opening the industry to foreign
investors who could modernize equipment and increase production. U.S.
officials hope that spreading oil profit fairly across the country would
cause instability to ebb.

Iraq's cabinet, the Council of Ministers, approved a draft oil measure in
February. From there, it was to go to parliament. U.S. officials predicted
passage would be quick, but it has stalled.

The objections are as vast and technical as the measure itself and reflect
the wider problems facing Iraq: regional distrust of the Shiite-led central
government; wariness of foreign interest; and anger toward the United
States, which many Iraqis believe invaded Iraq solely to get its hands on
the oil.

Kurds object

The Kurdish regional government voiced its opposition to the measure last
month after seeing lists drawn up by the Iraqi central government that
categorized the oil fields according to levels of development and
geographical boundaries. Those factors would determine who would manage the
fields and the contracts involving them - regional authorities or the
state-run Iraq National Oil Co., which has yet to be established.

Kurdish authorities say the lists gave 93% of fields to the national oil
company, including some they say are at least partially in Kurdish
territory. Their dissatisfaction has been made blazingly clear on the
Kurdistan regional government website, which has posted the lists along with
comments in red letters beside the sections they oppose.

"WRONG!" and "TOO BIG!" are common remarks.

Kurdish officials have said that unless the lists are redrawn, they will not
support the bill. Kurdish parties control about one-fifth of the parliament.

Other points of contention, which have drawn in Sunnis as well as Shiites,
involve the mechanism for distributing oil profit and the degree of foreign
participation in a committee that would set policy on contracts and other
industry issues.

None of those is clarified in the proposed legislation.

"Quite a lot of it is not good, to be honest," said a Western energy expert
in Baghdad who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid angering Iraqi
officials. "A lot of the difficult questions were fudged, like revenue
sharing and who controls the oil fields. These obviously are vitally
important, but they wanted a benchmark passed, so it was pushed," he said,
referring to U.S. officials.

The question of how to divvy the money is especially troublesome because of
Sunni Arab and Kurdish distrust of the Shiite-led government. Under the
proposed law, the central government would control a bank account used for
distributing oil proceeds.

"There were ideas that checks from the single oil account should have three
signatures: one should be Sunni; one should be Shiite; one should be Kurd,"
said Zalmay Khalilzad, the former U.S. ambassador to Iraq who left the post
in March.

Passing the measure "requires a very hands-on effort by the international
community, by the United States," Khalilzad said. "This is the paradox of
this situation. We have a greater sense of urgency because of our situation
than they do."

The Western energy expert said Iraqi politicians estimate that a decision
will take a few months or perhaps until the end of the year. "They say,
'Hang on, this is an important law, we're not just going to pass it,' " he
said.

Foreign investment

Next to how to divide the money, the most contentious issue appears to be
the role of foreign investment. The measure envisions profit-sharing
agreements, which reward foreign contractors for doing business in risky
environments.

Even those who support the proposal as a framework have reservations about
the details.

"All in all, we need the new law. The existing ones are very old," said
Haider Abadi, a member of Maliki's Islamic Dawa Party, a Shiite group.
"Having said this, though, it does not mean that at this stage we are for a
full opening of the doors to foreign investment in the oil sector."

Salim Abdullah Jabouri, a spokesman for the Sunni bloc, also expressed
concern about having foreign companies profiting from Iraqi oil. "We think
that the timing of this law is not suitable," he said.

Some of the fiercest opposition has come from oil workers, who threatened to
go on strike this week to protest the legislation.

Imad Abdul Hussain, a leader of the Federation of Oil Unions, said workers
want oil production to remain in government hands.

"Oil is Iraq's sovereignty. It is the only wealth in Iraq. It unifies
Iraqis. When we give it to a foreign investor, this means the sovereignty is
taken away," he said.

Energy experts, though, say Iraq has no hope of increasing production
without foreign expertise and money.

Beyond all the political issues looms Iraq's most basic problem: security.
The country may need help from outside investors, but "without security and
a stable regime, none of this will mean much, because they won't come in,"
said Gal Luft, an energy expert at the Institute for the Analysis of Global
Security, a Washington think tank that studies energy-related security
issues.

There were at least 15 attacks on Iraqi oil facilities in the first three
months of the year, according to the institute. They included slayings of
oil industry workers and bombings of wells and the pipeline that carries oil
from Baiji, in northern Iraq, to Turkey.

The number of attacks is lower than during the same period last year, but
Luft said that is because saboteurs' favorite target, the pipeline, has been
hit so many times that it rarely functions.

"They normally do not attack pipelines that are not in operation," Luft
said.

susman at latimes.com

Copyright 2007 Los Angeles Times

Article printed from www.CommonDreams.org 

URL to article: http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/05/13/1154/

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20070514/c38a9ad0/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 6731 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20070514/c38a9ad0/attachment-0001.gif