[Dialogue] Shocked
LAURELCG at aol.com
LAURELCG at aol.com
Thu Oct 11 01:30:07 EDT 2007
This conversation has reminded me of a time when I was listening in awe to
JWM speak about some particular strategy he was proposing, I think for local
churches in North America. I was sitting close to the front of the Lumumba room,
definitely in Joe's huge energy field. He had a diagram on the board, and as
he punched the various points he had been laying out, he said something like,
"If we do this, this, this and this, we'll RAPE (big gesture!) the whole
country!" As if that would be a good thing. Contemplating the memory can still
evoke a very deeply felt emotion in me, something like shame, and bring tears.
It really was a shock, as if I'd been struck. It was not a new feeling,
having grown up in a church where I "got" that to be female was not to be fully
human, and with an alcoholic father who was less than sensitive with his
language. The shock was to hear this in the Order, where I could speak, and had
taken refuge from the "women are to keep silent in the church" theology. Thank
goodness that where sin abounds, grace abounds more!
Thanks, Margaret, for not keeping silent.
Love and blessings,
Jann McGuire
In a message dated 10/10/07 3:23:16 PM, aiseayew at netins.net writes:
<< Randy, I appreciate your words from one perspective, but. . .
The point is not missed. The comment is to point out that a point can be
obliterated by such insensitivity and trying to recouch it in personal particular
historical moral justification does nothing for women today who are still
having to put up with it. That what I was shocked by was not clear and obvious
is even more disturbing and belies the entire onslaught of justifications.
Margaret >>
<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> See what's new at
http://www.aol.com</HTML>
More information about the Dialogue
mailing list