[Dialogue] [Oe List ...] Respectful Dialogue?

KroegerD at aol.com KroegerD at aol.com
Mon Oct 22 08:08:52 EDT 2007


 
Thanks for outing what has become an embarrassing attitude that is more  
prevalent than I had thought.
 
I do think you are giving the legacy ICA/OE much more credit than we  deserve 
for respecting and  encouraging diversity.
 
You will find that the great majority of the comments you have pointed out  
are made by white males who for whatever reason cannot seem to "get over  it".  
The polity of the ICA/OE was always dominated by these same  types of voices, 
and the same attitude of "my way or the highway".  
 
Fortunately, the organizations contained a majority of independent thinkers  
and actors who acted in defiance of "the consensus" and because of those  
courageous actions changed the world (a little bit).
 
As Rodney King asks---"can't we all just get along?"
 
Dick Kroeger
 
In a message dated 10/22/2007 6:28:43 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
cantenen at mac.com writes:

Ethicist Randy Cohen of the New York Times states  that when someone makes 
derogatory remarks about another  - 
it is hurtful and damaging to the  other person.  At this point it is no 
longer an issue of  etiquette 
(you can’t just brush it off as a joke or a  harmless insensitive comment). 
It is a matter of ethics and we all have an  obligation to stand up against 
thoughtless, prejudicial and racist  comments.


We have a responsibility to clearly state and  respond unambiguously to 
stereotypical and offensive  remarks.


When we decided to become members of the ICA  community - we did so because 
we thought this  group respected 
and valued diversity and every individual’s  worth.  We would hate to think - 
that this image is just a public  screen.  


That below the surface as a community we allow  and even support the kind of 
behavior as exhibited in some  emails.
  
We may think that what occurred was between a  closed group of people.  In 
fact many people on these list serves falsely  think 
they are having private conversations that  have no accountability to the 
rest of the  world.  
That if they publicly support “caring for  the excluded” then what they 
truly believe is not relevant.
  
We are here to say that is not so – we will stand  up against these 
ill-thought and discriminatory  statements.


Imagine how these messages feel to a person who  is targeted.  
Imagine how the rest of the world receives these  messages.
  
It is not always easy to stand up for what we  believe.  But ICA has a long 
history of declaring respect  for all persons and all cultures.  
It is our hope that we can continue to do  so.


Carolyn Houpt Antenen, Suganya Sockalingam, and  Kathleen Joyce  



On Oct 19, 2007, at 6:39 PM, W. J. wrote:




Take a guess and you have a 25% chance of getting it right (unless  you're 
the latest newbie running the Kemper Building and threfore  assumed the correct 
answer is obviously #2).
 
Marshall
 

David Walters <_walters at alaweb.com_ (mailto:walters at alaweb.com) >  wrote:

 
_Take The Quiz!_ (http://2gthunderation.blogspot.com/2007/05/take-quiz.html)  

 
If you have found this page, then you may be looking for  someone. Someone 
you knew a long time ago but lost track of.
It's quite  possible that the people you are looking for are also looking for 
 you.

take the quiz, send your answers to the blog owner via e-mail  & we'll be in 
touch. It's multiple choice, or  course.









 



Yes,  he's a 'corporate' Oreo black like the last black interim ED. I took 
one  look and instantly said to myself, "Oh, one of those  guys." Meaning a 
certain mindset. And of course he doesn't have a  clue.
M.




Richard Alton <_dick_alton at hotmail.com_ (mailto:dick_alton at hotmail.com) >  
wrote:
And he is black! Dick


Richard H.T. Alton International Consultants and  Associates 'building global 
bridges' 166 N. Humphrey Ave, Apt, 1N Oak  Park, IL 60302 T:1.773.344.7172 
_richard.alton at gmail.com_ (mailto:richard.alton at gmail.com)  Don't  let the fear 
of striking out hold you back Babe Ruth


Terry, you've made my point  beautifully. I totally agree with your 
perspective, and I'm very sorry the  Board chose not to offer you the position. 
Personally, I'm afraid it was  another huge mistake.
I also have to apologize to  my colleagues on this list for my intemperate 
language. Although the truth  of my instantaneous "read" on Mr. Tillman is 
accurately stated (in other  words, that's what I really think!), I didn't intend 
my unedited comments  to go to this list. I got a very brief message from Alton 
and hit the  reply button without noticing that it came thru the listserv! 
And I'm not  at all sure Dick thought his comment was going out there  either.
Moral of this story is that  you gotta read the small type, even when you're 
bleary-eyed. Or suffer the  embarrassment of telling the world your personal 
'truth.' Unlike certain  politicians, however, I'm not gonna spin it or try to 
slide out of  it.
I've tried to avoid  intemperate or hostile language in commenting on the 
ICA-USA board's  actions. But sometimes you gotta call a spade a spade. It's 
clear that  there's been an intentional cut-off or wipe-out of the previous  
corporate memory, and they've pushed the re-boot button without being able  to 
predict whether anything will be accessible on the hard drive, so to  speak.
Instead of taking  responsibility for guarding both the depth and wisdom of 
our 'corporate  culture', as well as the financial viability of the ICA-USA and 
the vision  and direction the staff was pursuing, they made the staff the 
'bad guys'  and wiped them out. The board did not admit their own failures and 
hold  themselves accountable to their historic (and aging)  constituency.
Instead, they are  attempting to re-invent the organization, almost from 
scratch, and  position it to serve a newly defined constituency and mission that 
may  have little in common with ICA's in twenty-nine other  nations.
That, I fear, presents a  difficult and challenging discontinuity, as well as 
a significant  organizational issue: for ICAI, for "the ICA brand" (to use 
corporate  lingo), which carries an immense sense of historical continuity or 
"who we  are", and, finally, for those of us whose lives have been so deeply 
marked  by who we were.
Do we have anything to do  with, or say to, this "new ICA"? Have they 
redefined themselves to include  or exclude us?
If ICA-USA were a  membership organization (like a union), then the voting 
members would  elect the board, who would be accountable to its constituency. 
But it's  not, folks. So they basically can do anything they want that doesn't 
drive  them into insolvency. They have to be amenable to major funders, of  
course, but if their grassroots base of small donors has dried up, then  they 
don't have to worry about what we think.
So, that's what I  really  think. Having said that,  it's clear that they've 
made their decision, and maybe it's time to stop  complaining,  sniping, and 
taking pot shots at obviously flawed  decision making. Like marching into Iraq 
and hanging Saddam Hussein, it's  a done deal, and now we have to live with it.
Marshall
I would be very happy with  an executive director who happened to grow up in 
Fifth City and was a  graduate of the Fifth City Preschool. That would be a 
plus. But I'm sure  Mr. Tillman has had other life experiences that have 
sensitized him to  issues of poverty and marginalization. As part of the group 
marginalized  by the board, I hope Mr. Tillman will be able to correct their myopia 
and  exert visionary leadership that will be challenging and  compelling.

_______________________________________________
Dialogue  mailing list
_Dialogue at wedgeblade.net_ (mailto:Dialogue at wedgeblade.net) 
http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/dialogue_wedgeblade.net



_______________________________________________
Dialogue mailing list
_Dialogue at wedgeblade.net_ (mailto:Dialogue at wedgeblade.net) 
_http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/dialogue_wedgeblade.net_ 
(http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/dialogue_wedgeblade.net) 



=

_______________________________________________
OE  mailing  list
OE at wedgeblade.net
http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/oe_wedgeblade.net







************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20071022/5a4c1525/attachment.html 


More information about the Dialogue mailing list