[Dialogue] Bush Plans War on Iran

Harry Wainwright h-wainwright at charter.net
Sun Sep 2 15:35:58 EDT 2007



Published on Sunday, September 2, 2007 by CommonDreams.org
<http://www.commondreams.org>  

Bush Plans War on Iran

by Marjorie Cohn

The Sunday Times of London is reporting that the Pentagon has plans for
three days of massive air strikes against 1,200 targets in Iran. Last week,
Alexis Debat, director of terrorism and national security at the Nixon
Center, told a meeting of The National Interest, a conservative foreign
policy journal, that the military did not intend to carry out “pinprick
strikes” against Iranian nuclear facilities. He said, “They’re about taking
out the entire Iranian military.”

Bush has already set the wheels in motion. With Rovian timing, Alberto
Gonzales’ resignation was sandwiched between two Bush screeds - one aimed at
ensuring Congress scares up $50 billion more for the occupation of Iraq, the
other designed to scare us into supporting war on Iran. As Gonzales rides
off into the sunset, the significant questions are who will take his place
and how that choice will facilitate Bush’s occupation of Iraq and attack on
Iran.

One name that’s been floated for Bush’s third attorney general is Joe
Lieberman, the “independent” senator from Connecticut. Lieberman, who
advocates the use of military force against Iran, was the only person Bush
quoted in his August 28 speech to the American Legion. Bush called Iran “the
world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism” and pledged to “confront
Tehran’s murderous activities.”

Gonzales greased the Bush/Cheney wheels for torturing in violation of the
Geneva Conventions, illegally spying on Americans, and purging disloyal
Bushies.

Similarly, Lieberman would ensure the Justice Department mounts a vigorous
defense of a war of aggression against Iran. And Bush would get a two-fer:
Connecticut’s Republican governor would appoint a Republican to fill
Lieberman’s seat, returning control of the Senate to the GOP. A
Republican-controlled Senate would direct the agenda, thereby furthering the
Bush/Cheney plan.

Lieberman is closely affiliated with American Israeli Public Affairs
Committee. “AIPAC leverages its power by an alliance with the Christian
Right, which has adopted a bizarre ideology of ‘Christian Zionism,’”
according to University of Michigan professor Juan Cole. “It holds that the
sooner the Palestinians are ethnically cleansed, the sooner Christ will come
back. Without millions of these Christian Zionist allies,” Cole added,
“AIPAC would be much less influential and effective.”

During the 2004 election, a 100% “AIPAC voting record” was Lieberman’s
litmus test for an acceptable presidential candidate. As the House of
Representatives was on the verge of passing a resolution that would’ve
required Bush to consult Congress before attacking Iran, the AIPAC lobby
stopped it in its tracks.

Bush’s WMD-hyping against Iran is déja vu in the run-up to Operation Iraqi
Disaster, where he played loose and fast with the truth about Iraq’s alleged
WMDs. His statement that a nuclear Iran could put the region “under the
shadow of a nuclear holocaust” conjures up his images of a “mushroom cloud”
in the hype-up to Iraq.

How inconvenient for Bush that the UN International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA) just found Iran’s uranium enrichment program is operating well below
capacity and is nowhere near producing significant amounts of nuclear fuel.
The IAEA report says Iran “has been providing the agency with access to
declared nuclear materials, and has provided the required nuclear material
accountancy reports in connection with declared nuclear material and
facilities.”

Iran and IAEA agreed on a plan with a step-by-step timetable of cooperation
to settle unresolved issues. The agreement said there were “no other
remaining issues and ambiguities regarding Iran’s past nuclear program and
activities,” and characterized the accord as “a significant step forward.”

“This is the first time Iran is ready to discuss all the outstanding issues
which triggered the crisis in confidence,” said IAEA director general
Mohamed ElBaradei. “I’m clear at this stage you need to give Iran a chance
to prove its stated goodwill. Sanctions alone, I know for sure, are not
going to lead to a durable solution”

In 2003, when Dr. ElBaradei reported there was no evidence that Iraq was
reconstituting its nuclear program, the White House was not pleased. And as
Saddam Hussein became more cooperative with the weapons inspector, Bush
became “infuriated,” according to Bob Woodward.

Bush’s vow, “We will confront this danger before it is too late,” is the
Iran incarnation of his illegal preemptive war doctrine, which he
inaugurated in Iraq. In a clear signal he is seeking regime change in Iran,
Bush called for “an Iran whose government is accountable to its people,
instead of leaders who promote terror and pursue the technology that could
be used to develop nuclear weapons.”

Barnett Rubin reported on Global Affairs blog that one of the leading
neo-conservative institutions has “instructions” from Dick Cheney’s office
to “roll out a campaign for war with Iran in the week after Labor Day; it
will be coordinated with the American Enterprise Institute, the Wall Street
Journal, the Weekly Standard, Commentary, Fox, and the usual suspects. It
will be heavy sustained assault on the airwaves, designed to knock public
sentiment into a position from which a war can be maintained. Evidently they
don’t think they’ll ever get majority support for this - they want something
like 35-40 percent support, which in their book is ‘plenty.’”

Bush/Cheney created the White House Iraq Group (WHIG) to lead a propaganda
campaign to bolster public support for war with Iraq. The White House
decided to wait until after Labor Day of 2002 to kick off WHIG’s mission.
Chief of staff Andrew Card explained, “From a marketing point of view, you
don’t introduce new products in August.” Five years later, they’re marketing
a new and even more dangerous product - war with Iran. British military
historian Corelli Barnett says “an attack on Iran would effectively launch
World War III.”

Our military spending has reached $1 billion every 2-1/2 days and we are
borrowing $2-1/2 billion per day. Bush is mortgaging our children’s future
security and wealth.
We have lost more than 3,700 soldiers in Iraq and tens of thousands of
Iraqis have died.

We have already seen how easily Congress caves in to AIPAC. It’s up to the
people. As Noam Chomsky said, “The most effective barrier to a White House
decision to launch a war [on Iran] is the kind of organized popular
opposition that frightened the political-military leadership enough in 1968
that they were reluctant to send more troops to Vietnam.”

Marjorie Cohn is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law and President
of the National Lawyers Guild. Her new book, Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the
Bush Gang Has Defied the Law
<http://www.amazon.com/dp/0977825337?tag=commondreams-20&camp=0&creative=0&l
inkCode=as1&creativeASIN=0977825337&adid=1PTAYV6DYBWX5198NGC2&> , was just
published. Her articles are archived at http://www.marjoriecohn.com
<http://www.marjoriecohn.com/> .

Article printed from www.CommonDreams.org 

URL to article: http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/09/02/3565/

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20070902/01281aa8/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 6731 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20070902/01281aa8/attachment-0001.gif 


More information about the Dialogue mailing list