[Dialogue] cultural quake hits California; national backlash expected

[darrell walker]

Marshall, et al,
    A further political note on the California Supreme Court decision on gay marriage.  Six of the seven justices on the Supreme Court are Republicans.  Of the four-justice majority, three were Republicans.  The six Republicans split evenly on the decision.  Also Governor Schwarzenegger will oppose the constitutional amendment in the fall.  All of which is to say, in spite of appearances to the contrary at times, not all California Republicans are the blithering idiots they appear to be elsewhere.  I say that in defense of the thirty-five years I spent as a Republican before waking up in the gutter during the Reagan era and becoming a Democrat.
    Darrell Walker in  Lincoln, CA, outside of Sacramento
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: W. J. 
  To: oe at wedgeblade.net ; dialogue at wedgeblade.net 
  Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:55 PM
  Subject: [Dialogue] cultural quake hits California;national backlash expected


  Today, in the midst of a tropical heatwave in northern California, our state's Supreme Court declared that to deny marriage to any couple is to brand them as second class citizens. In a month, for the first time ever, fully ten percent of US citizens will be able to marry whomever they choose.

  Starting tomorrow, Californians expect every rich right-wing bigot in the country to join in the coming political fray by raising multiple millions of U$D for the right-wing organizations that have put an amendment on the November ballot to roll back the court decision and enshrine discrimination in the state constitution.

  Bottom line is, it ain't over till it's over. Today's court decision will provoke a major call to arms by the vast right-wing conspiracy, hopefully their last gasp before they're buried in a Democratic landslide in November.

  The backlash from this decision may have a huge impact on national politics. The money that will flow to California to support the amendment may shift the outcome of the presidential election. If the amendment prevails, California will go to Senator John McBush, and that means that Barack will be history like Kerry, Gore, and Dukakis. Which may give Hillary another shot in 2012.

  On a more personal note: some of my friends were plaintiffs in this case, and one of them is a child of an interracial couple whose marriage was made legal by a decision of the California Supreme Court in 1948.

  Finally, I am grateful that for the first time, I will be able to conduct legal marriage ceremonies for same-gender couples in California as a United Methodist clergyman. If anyone chooses to bring a complaint to my bishop, I'll be very happy to participate in a church trial. 

  The United Methodist Discipline prohibits clergy from conducting 'ceremonies of homosexual union,' but it does not prohibit clergy from officiating at (some) legal marriages permitted by the state. To do so would place the church in a position of discriminating against a minority of its members whom the state allows to marry.

  Marshall Jones





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Dialogue mailing list
  Dialogue at wedgeblade.net
  http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/dialogue_wedgeblade.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20080516/49545448/attachment.html