[Dialogue] NSP: Re: Progressive manifesto
KroegerD at aol.com
KroegerD at aol.com
Sat May 31 15:50:59 EDT 2008
I think the point was that the some seem to use the Old Testament to justify
the subjugation of gays and women, the death penalty, war, slavery and the
right of Israel to kill Palestinians.
Dick Kroeger
In a message dated 5/31/2008 9:06:00 A.M. Central Daylight Time, pk
adam at aol.com writes:
While 24 of the 25 points are fabulous, one of Rabbi Lerner' key points is
the legitimacy of religious experience to people's lives.
Just a clarification. One of the writer's points was:
"* You think it's crazy to use the Old Testament as a policy guide for the
21st century."
The Hebrew Bible is what Christians refer to as the Old Testament. Once
again, a supposedly progressive writer has shown his ignorance of and/or
contempt for Judaism and Christianity. Not exactly reaching out to those of us
who love our traditions.
1)Read Deuteronomy 15. - "Be generous with the poor."
2)Read Amos, Hosea, Micah, and Isaiah. All went to the richest city of
Israel (Bethel) and said, "Practice Justice."
3) Amos was the first writer in Western history to combine religion and
ethics. And the world has never looked back.
4)The tipping point that made the political rulers decide to kill Jesus is
when he quoted from a speech by Jeremiah which said, "How you worship is
irrelevant. Only if you take care of the weakest members of society will you not
profane my name." ( He also quoted from a speech by Isaiah which called the
religious/political leaders, "silent dogs with voracious appetites". Mel
Gibson missed so much.)
Certainly the practitioners of Christian and Judaic traditions can be
legitimately criticized for their just being content with religious ritual and
their subsequent silence regarding justice, but not with sweeping dismissive
statements of ignorance.
Philip Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: KroegerD at aol.com
To: nspmn at googlegroups.com; Dialogue at wedgeblade.net;
dfl-faith at yahoogroups.com; dflcd3 at gmail.com
Cc: rabbilerner at tikkun.org; ckushell at earthlink.net
Sent: Fri, 30 May 2008 5:27 pm
Subject: NSP: Progressive manifesto
I think this is a pretty comprehensive definition of the progressive
movement in our time.
Dick Kroeger
So who is a progressive? You might be one if ...
* You think health care is a basic human right, and that single-payer
national health insurance is a worthwhile reform on our way toward creating a
non-profit national health care service.
* You think that human rights ought always to trump property rights.
* You think U.S. military spending is an obscene waste of resources, and
that the only freedom this spending protects is the freedom of economic elites
to exploit working people all around the planet.
* You think U.S. troops should be brought home not only from Afghanistan and
Iraq, but from all 130 countries in which the U.S. has military bases.
* You think political leaders who engage in "preemptive war" and invasions
should be brought to trial for crimes against humanity and judged against the
standards of international law established at Nuremberg after World War Two.
* You think public education should be free, not just from kindergarten
through high school, but as far as a person is willing and able to go.
* You think that electoral reform should include instant run-off voting,
publicly-financed elections, easy ballot access for all parties, and
proportional representation.
* You think that electoral democracy is not enough, and that democracy must
also be participatory and extend to workplaces.
* You think that strengthening the rights of all workers to unionize and
bargain collectively is a useful step toward full economic democracy.
* You think that as a society we have a collective obligation to provide
everyone who is willing and able to work with a job that pays a living wage and
offers dignity.
* You think that a class system which forces some people to do dirty,
dangerous, boring work all the time, while others get to do clean, safe,
interesting work all the time, can never deliver social justice.
* You think that regulating big corporations isn't enough, and that such
corporations, if they are allowed to exist at all, must either serve the common
good or be put into public receivership.
* You think that the legal doctrine granting corporations the same
constitutional rights as natural persons is absurd and must be overturned.
* You think it's wrong to allow individuals to accumulate wealth without
limits, and that the highest incomes should be capped well before they begin to
threaten community and democracy.
* You think that wealth, not just income, should be taxed.
* You think it's crazy to use the Old Testament as a policy guide for the
21st century.
* You believe in celebrating diversity, while also recognizing that having
women and people of color proportionately represented among the class of
oppressors is not the goal we should be aiming for.
* You think that the state has no right to kill, and that putting people to
death to show that killing is wrong will always be a self-defeating policy.
* You think that anyone who desires the reins of power that come with high
political office should, by reason of that desire, be seen as unfit for the
job.
* You think that instead of more leaders, we need fewer followers.
* You think that national borders, while sometimes establishing territories
of safety, more often establish territories of exploitation, much like gang
turf.
* You are open to considering how the privileges you enjoy because of race,
class, gender, sexual orientation, and/or physical ability might come at the
expense of others.
* You believe that voting every few years is a weak form of political
participation, and that achieving social justice requires concerted effort before,
during, and after elections.
* You think that, ideally, no one would have more wealth more than they need
until everyone has at least as much as they need to live a safe, happy,
decent life.
* You recognize that an economic system which requires continuous expansion,
destroys the environment, relies on rapidly-depleting fossil fuels,
exacerbates inequality, and leads to war after war is unsustainable and must be
replaced. Score a bonus point if you understand that sticking to the existing
system is what's unrealistic.
No doubt some readers will say this list is incomplete. It is. Many policy
issues of importance to progressives go unmentioned. Others might say that the
list leans too far to the left, or not far enough. It could also be said
that some items are vague (what does it mean to say that human rights ought
always to trump property rights?). These are all useful responses. If we hope to
work together to transform the social world, we need to know what we agree
on, what we don't agree on, and what needs further hashing-out.
In the end, however, it's not labels and identities and criteria for
bestowing them that really matter. Political terms have consequences, but only
because of how we use them. Which suggests another item for the list. You might be
a progressive if you think that it's important to take seriously the meaning
of political identities, but that what really matters is living out those
identities in ways that help to create more peace, justice, and equality.
Michael Schwalbe is a professor of sociology at North Carolina State
University. His most recent book is _Rigging the Game: How Inequality Is Reproduced
in Everyday Life_
(http://www.amazon.com/dp/0195333004?tag=commondreams-20&camp=0&creative=0&linkCode=as1&creativeASIN=0195333004&adid=1HCR52M8M322FV7FDZC3&)
(Oxford, 2008).
____________________________________
Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. _Watch "Cooking with Tyler Florence"
on AOL Food_
(http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002) .
____________________________________
Stay informed, get connected and more _with AOL on your phone_
(http://mobile.aol.com/productOverview.jsp?productOverview=aol-mobile-overview&?&ncid=aolmbd
00030000000139) .
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Network of Spiritual Progressives MN" group. To post to this group, send email
to NSPMN at googlegroups.com . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
NSPMN-unsubscribe at googlegroups.com . You can also group messages into a digest
at http://groups.google.com/group/NSPMN
Announcements are sent from a separate list at:
http://groups.google.com/group/Network-of-Spiritual-Progressives-MN-A...
We have two lists, so people can choose if they want just announcements or
both announcements and discussions (which could be a lengthy list). We
appreciate your interest and wish to allow you to make that choice!
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
**************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with
Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.
(http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20080531/5b35087d/attachment.html
More information about the Dialogue
mailing list