[Dialogue] Fw: [MAPN] O&G Lease Sale still in the news - SLTribune

Colleen Smith smith_journey at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 16 19:38:38 EST 2008


I do hope these articles will forward.  I tried to go to the source, but unhappilly, they wanted payment.  Please, if you are so moved, contact your congressmen and ask them to pressure the BLM to take these leases off the market.  The econmics are very short sighted, a lot of out lay for very little return.  The damage to the water shed and the Colorado River threatens the water supply not only of Moab but the geography from here to the Sea of Cortez.  The parcels go on auction in early December.  Please help stop this..
Colleen Smith 
---






Two great hits on the upcoming O&G lease sale appeared in the Salt Lake Trib this weekend:
1 - Karen's letter to the Editor
2 - Tom Wharton's column


http://www.sltrib. com/ci_10999707


Backyard drilling
Public Forum Letter
Article Last Updated: 11/16/2008 11:11:08 AM MST

The Bureau of Land Management has managed to wrest the phrase "not in my backyard" from figurative to literal by allowing oil and gas companies to buy leases on occupied lots in residential neighborhoods in the Moab area. This would literally allow drilling in people's backyards.
The BLM quietly opened these leases on Election Day (merely a coincidence, it says, not intended to be lost in the election news cycle). No homeowners were notified of the upcoming lease. Neither Grand County nor Moab City was notified. The water district was not notified, even though part of the property to be leased is in our drinking water watershed.
It is despicable and negligent to allow drilling adjacent to our irreplaceable national parks. It becomes personal and heartless when BLM allows it in my backyard.
Oil and gas developers are not using even 50 percent of the lands they have already leased. These should be utilized before more lands are made available.
Over the past 15 years, drilling on federal lands in the West has produced an average of 3.6 days per year of oil. Is that worth it to destroy our incredible landscape and our homes?
Karen Robinson
Moab
* * * * * * *




http://www.sltrib. com/ci_10965344



Print   Email    Font Resize
Wharton: Oil leases don't meet smell test
By Tom Wharton
Tribune Columnist
Article Last Updated: 11/15/2008 12:51:53 PM MST

Tom Wharton
There are certain places in the world so special, even sacred, that they should never be developed.
Proposed oil-drilling leases on Bureau of Land Management property near Arches and Canyonlands national parks, Desolation Canyon and Dinosaur National Monument fit in that category. It is difficult to imagine oil rigs marring the world-class landscapes around these places or to figure out why people we pay and trust to be stewards of the land would ruin them.
What makes the proposed Dec. 19 leases especially maddening is the sleazy, secretive way the BLM issued them.
You know these proposals don't meet the smell test when they are hidden from a sister agency such as the National Park Service, when every effort has been made to obscure what is actually happening from the public and when they are being done by a lame-duck presidential administration headed by two oil men.
You know the BLM is in bed with the oil industry when it issues a vague notice for the leases on the afternoon of a presidential election in hopes no one will notice. Then, when the press and public find out what is going on, the agency does everything it can to obscure its actual intentions.
You know that mischief, perhaps of a political nature, is afoot when the agency even starts proposing to exercise drilling rights in a Moab neighborhood. Are the agency and the oil industry trying to teach some of the area's tree-hugging, development- opposing environmentalists a lesson?

And, finally, you know just how awful these proposed leases are when the incoming Obama administration makes figuring out how to void them when it takes office in January one of its priorities.
It is difficult to believe that career professionals within the BLM are not embarrassed by how the Bush administration has politicized the environmental protection process in a rush to issue as many drilling leases as possible before it leaves office.
Yes, we need energy to run our economy. Because our automakers have concentrated on making gas-guzzling SUVs, our Congress has been in the pocket of the oil industry and we have ignored the coming energy crisis for years. We are going to need to have some limited domestic drilling and continue to use coal for power while developing new technology to run our energy-dependent society.
But do Utahns really want the short-term gain such drilling might bring when it could threaten the long-term viability of the state's tourist industry? Don't we deserve a government that listens to the public and doesn't try to hide its actions?
Forget all that. It is simply wrong to industrialize these sacred places for a few drops of oil. We can only hope the Obama administration and the courts can somehow quickly correct the abuses of the BLM, an agency that should be embarrassed by the way it has been operating, especially in Utah.
Tom Wharton is a columnist. Reach him at wharton at sltrib. com or 801-257-8909.
__._,_.___ 
Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic 
Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Polls | Calendar 

MARKETPLACE



>From kitchen basics to easy recipes - join the Group from Kraft Foods 
 
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional 
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe 



Recent Activity


 2
New Members

 5
New FilesVisit Your Group 


New web site?
Drive traffic now.
Get your business
on Yahoo! search.

Y! Messenger
Send pics quick
Share photos while
you IM friends.

Health Groups
for people over 40
Join people who are
staying in shape.
. 
__,_._,___ 














      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20081116/19072a54/attachment.html>


More information about the Dialogue mailing list