[Dialogue] Emailing: Editorial - The Limits of Term Limits - Editorial - ...

Wed Oct 1 15:20:06 EDT 2008

Where was the NYT when Rudi wanted to extend his term to continue dealing with the after effects of 9/11?  Bloomberg, said "No way?"  Jeez, why don't they (NYT and Bloomberg) just say, "one set of rules for them, another set for us."

Don Elliott

-----Original Message-----
From: GWEnsinger at aol.com
To: dialogue at wedgeblade.net
Sent: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 1:07 pm
Subject: Re: [Dialogue] Emailing: Editorial - The Limits of Term Limits - Editorial - ...

It should be noted that New Yorkers have twice voted to keep term limits. That's democracy at work, too.

Ann Ensinger

In a message dated 10/1/2008 1:40:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, h-wainwright at charter.net writes:

October 1, 2008

Editorial

The Limits of Term Limits 

The bedrock of American democracy is the voters’ right to choose. Though well intentioned, New York City’s term limits law severely limits that right, which is why this page has opposed term limits from the outset. The law is particularly unappealing now because it is structured in a way that would deny New Yorkers — at a time when the city’s economy is under great stress — the right to decide for themselves whether an effective and popular mayor should stay in office.

Partly for this reason, and partly to extend their own political careers, a majority of City Council members are thinking about amending the city law to allow elected officials to serve three consecutive terms 
instead of two. That would permit Mayor Michael Bloomberg to run again in 2009 and could also prolong the service of council members and other senior elected officials. Mr. Bloomberg, who is expected to announce on Thursday that he will seek a third term if he can, likes the idea a lot. 

We do, too. But we would go further and ask the Council to abolish term limits altogether — not to serve any individual’s political career but to serve the larger cause of democracy.

It makes a lot of people uncomfortable to legislatively rewrite a law that voters have twice approved at the ballot box — in 1993 and 1996. It makes us uncomfortable, too, and we previously took the position that any change should be left to the voters. But we have concluded now that changing the law legislatively does not make us nearly as uncomfortable as keeping it. It is within the rights of the Council, itself an elected body, to do so.

Term limits are seductive, promising relief from mediocre, self-perpetuating incumbents and gridlocked legislatures. They are also profoundly undemocratic, arbitrarily denying voters the ability to choose between good politicians and bad, especially in a city like New York with a strong public campaign-financing system, while automatically removing public servants of proven ability who are at a productive point in their careers.

The City Council members who want to change the law are not alone. A survey in The Times last month found that at least two dozen local governments ar
e suffering buyer’s remorse about the term limits they adopted, mostly in the 1990s. One common complaint is that they force politicians to focus on small-bore projects that can be achieved quickly rather than visionary ideas. The constant churning also diminishes accountability in governmental institutions like the City Council. 

Most places that are trying to relax term limits are likely to do so via the ballot box, with several referendums due in November. There is a chance that a vote on the issue could be organized early next year in New York in conjunction with special elections to the City Council. But such elections do not attract many voters. In the end, a vote by the Council is probably the most democratic way to address the matter. 

It is worth repeating: This is a rule that needs to be abolished. If the voters don’t like the result, they can register their views at the polls.

Home 

World 

U.S. 

N.Y. / Region 

Business 

Technology 

Science 

Health 

Sports 

Opinion 

Arts 

Style 

Travel 

Jobs 

Real Estate 

Automobiles 

Back to Top 

Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company 

Privacy Policy 

Search 

Corrections 

RSS 

First Look 

Help 

Contact Us 

Work for Us 

Site Map 

_______________________________________________
Dialogue mailing list
Dialogue at wedgeblade.net
http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/dialogue_wedgeblade.net

Looking for simple solutions to20your real-life financial challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and calculators.

_______________________________________________
ialogue mailing list
ialogue at wedgeblade.net
ttp://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/dialogue_wedgeblade.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20081001/45a4acb5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 1810 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20081001/45a4acb5/attachment-0004.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 45 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20081001/45a4acb5/attachment-0005.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20081001/45a4acb5/attachment-0006.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 5655 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20081001/45a4acb5/attachment-0007.gif>