[Dialogue] spong 9-11
KroegerD at aol.com
KroegerD at aol.com
Thu Sep 11 14:17:43 EDT 2008
Thursday September 11, 2008 Hurricane Gustav, Sarah Palin and the
Republican Convention It was widely reported in the media that James Dobson,
the evangelical head of "Focus on the Family," had prayed for rain to fall when
Senator Barack Obama delivered his acceptance speech to 80,000 people in the
Denver Broncos' outdoor stadium. If he has that kind of uninformed and
magical theology, I wonder how he interpreted the fact that Hurricane Gustav
disrupted the Republican National Convention, at least on its first day. Democrat
Michael Moore called the hurricane "an act of God" visited on the
Republicans, which demonstrates that both Democrats and Republicans can be pathetic
theologians. The only thing more disillusioning than religious politicians is
politicized religion.
Both President Bush and Vice President Cheney cancelled their appearances at
this convention to attend to the nation's well being in the light of the
hurricane attacking the Gulf Coast. Politics is a strange and inexact game,
however, and most commentators felt that given the low popularity of both the
President and the Vice President this was in fact a plus not a minus to the
McCain campaign. Their absences took a potentially embarrassing situation away
from the convention and made it a little more difficult for the Democrats to
run against the "Bush-McCain Ticket." In addition to that, Senator McCain,
aware of the political disaster that Hurricane Katrina was to the Bush
administration just three years ago, used this natural disaster to demonstrate that he
was not George Bush. He presided over the television screen in such a way as
to live out his theme of "Country First." Hurricane Gustav may just prove to
be more helpful to the Arizona Senator in his election fight than more
hackneyed speeches where the theme is to recite the words "The next President of
the United States" and "God Bless America" as many times as possible. McCain
also obviously wanted to avoid television's split screens juxtaposing
Republicans partying while the people in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast suffered.
Prior to Hurricane Gustav, in a decision that took Democratic enthusiasm and
the Obama/Biden acceptance speeches off prime time and refocused the
nation's attention on the McCain campaign, the Senator announced that Governor Sarah
Palin of Alaska was his choice for vice president. It was a surprising
choice to say the least, even, as we learned later, to some members of McCain's
inner circle. Just 16 months ago, Ms. Palin was the mayor of the Alaskan town
of Wasilla with less than 7000 people. The spin doctors had to work overtime
to turn her appointment into a plus for anyone but the evangelical vote, to
whom she was a perfect choice. Senator McCain was playing a wild card. His
appeal to Democrats and Independents is based at least in part on his reputation
as a moderate, or at least a maverick, but he is not trusted among
evangelicals as President Bush had been. He attempted to shore up that support with the
choice of Governor Palin, but he sacrificed potential Independent and
Democratic support in the process. Time will tell whether this calculation was a
wise move or not.
Governor Palin has an interesting profile from her beauty queen and ice
hockey days to her ability to stand down corruption in her own party and win the
governorship of Alaska against heavy odds. Nonetheless, for Republicans to
proclaim her as having vast "executive experience" sounded thin indeed.
Her evangelical credentials were not in doubt. Governor Palin was for years
a member of an evangelical Assembly of God Church. She is opposed both
personally and professionally to abortion with no exceptions. She has supported a
constitutional amendment to the Alaska Constitution to ban gay marriage,
favors teaching "creation science" in public schools as an alternative to
evolution and opposes sex education in the public schools. She is a champion of
"teaching abstinence." All of that makes her the dream candidate for the
evangelical vote.
Politically she satisfied the Republican conservatives on gun control and by
supporting Pat Buchanan for president in 1996. The fact that her son is in
the Army and bound for Iraq this month was another important point in her
biography. Senator McCain apparently hoped that with her on his ticket he might
yet attract those women voters who are still upset about Senator Hillary
Clinton's narrow defeat to Senator Obama. Ms. Palin appealed to those voters
immediately when she was first introduced to the public by Senator McCain. Tossing
bouquets in the direction of both Representative Geraldine Ferraro and
Senator Hillary Clinton who, she said, had paved the way for her, she even
suggested that she would be the one finally to remove the glass ceiling into which
Hillary had placed "18,000,000 cracks."
Will that strategy work? It has never worked before. In 1988 Vice President
George H. W. Bush believed he could appeal to the women's vote by appointing
a handsome young man to be his running mate. That is how Dan Quayle became
vice president. Nonetheless, George Bush lost the female vote substantially in
1988 and lost the White House in 1992. Quayle was judged a liability to the
ticket in both years. Politicians do not always understand that it seems
insulting to women to think that a candidate's sex rather than her competence will
determine their vote.
George H.W. Bush also once thought that he would elicit African-American
support for Republicans by appointing a black person to succeed Thurgood
Marshall on the Supreme Court. His choice of Clarence Thomas, however, was viewed as
insulting to black voters since Thomas' public positions time and again
seemed to be at odds with the vested interests of the African-American
population. Again, it seemed insulting to think that black Americans would support a
candidate of their race who did not reflect their interests.
The choice of a vice president is the first major decision the presumptive
nominee has to make, and as such it provides an opportunity for undecided
voters to evaluate Senator McCain's judgment of what both the country and his
campaign need. From that perspective, Governor Palin remains a strange choice.
Senator McCain is 72, the oldest person in American history to seek the
presidency for the first time, and he has some major health issues, including a
diagnosis of melanoma and four surgical procedures to contain it. Three of them
were routine, but the fourth was extensive to excise where the melanoma had
invaded his temple. That accounts for the distortion on the left side of his
face. Earlier in the campaign, recognizing these health issues, he stated that
his first and primary criterion for the vice presidency was a "readiness to
assume the responsibilities of the Presidency." Not even by the wildest
stretch of the imagination does this appointment qualify on that basis. One can
hardly pretend that being mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, or serving 16 months in
the governor's office of a state with the population of the city of Austin,
Texas, qualifies one to be the leader of the free world. Former senator Fred
Thompson was disingenuous in his convention speech on Tuesday night when he
referred to Alaska as "America's largest state."
Second, the voting public gets to evaluate the decision-making process
through which the candidate for the presidency goes to make major decisions. There
was no confidence built in this area when it is recognized that Governor
Palin was a last-minute choice and that Senator McCain, who preferred Governor
Tom Ridge of Pennsylvania or Independent and close friend Joseph Lieberman of
Connecticut, bowed to evangelical pressure and named Governor Palin. We
learned that Senator McCain had interviewed her only once on the day before he
made the announcement. That hardly seemed like sufficient preparation to place
his candidacy for president into another person's hands and to place her
potentially into a position that is just one heartbeat from the presidency. When
it was revealed in the opening days of the convention that Governor Palin's
17-year-old daughter was five months pregnant, we wonder what other surprises
might be forthcoming. I hope Senator McCain knows that a thorough vetting of
one who will potentially have their hands on the ultimate instruments of
power seems to be the barest of all pre-requisites to the appointment. Yes, it is
true that the office frequently makes the person who occupies it, but the
office has to have a substantial person on which to work its magic.
It is clear and regularly stated in the media that this election is Barack
Obama's to lose. Everything is running against the Republicans, from the
unpopularity of the Bush presidency to the state of the economy to the wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq, to the drop in housing values and finally to the price of
gasoline. Senator McCain must get every break and make no mistakes to gain
the White House. Is that possible? In politics everything is possible, but
being caught between Hurricane Gustav and the choice of Governor Palin is not a
good way to begin.
Other impressions at the Republican Convention I simply file by title:
1. The three major speakers on Tuesday night, President Bush and
Senators Thompson and Lieberman, had one thing in common: Each was an aging,
grey-haired white male. When the TV cameras panned the audience they looked fully
representative of their listeners.
2. Sarah Palin exceeded all expectations. There will be no "Thomasina
Eagleton."
3. Does anyone still remember Dan Quayle attacking Murphy Brown for
conceiving a baby out of wedlock? That issue now seems politically dead even in
evangelical circles. Bristol Palin has been embraced. No one has yet
mentioned that Sarah Palin's oldest child was born eight months after her
"elopement." People don't remember that Ronald Reagan and Nancy had a child seven months
after they were married and John McCain was having an affair with Cindy
before he left his first wife. Bill Clinton begins to look like a monk.
Politics-strange indeed!
– John Shelby Spong
____________________________________
Question and Answer
With John Shelby Spong
John Bakerfrom Canton, Ohio, writes: At age 82, I am greatly impressed by
your writings. I am currently reading Jesus for the Non-Religious and have
often wished that your speaking engagements might include a visit to some
location within 50 or 60 miles of where I live. Perhaps a greater possibility is
that some pastor within a reachable radius is a disciple of yours or shares your
major views. I am a long-time member of a Presbyterian congregation, many
members of which are dear friends. However, church attendance long ago became
boring for me (but not for my wife). I gave up Sunday school because questions
I wanted to ask appeared to offend people I considered my friends. As a
youth I was confirmed in this same church and remember being told, when I
questioned beliefs that did not make sense to a 13-year-old, "You must have faith."
I enjoy your essays very much. If you can connect me with a "Spong pastor" or
followers within reach, I will be in even greater debt.
Dear John,
Thank you for your letter and kind comments. I regret that I do not know the
churches of Ohio well enough to direct you to a congregation and pastor that
would engage you deeply. One resource might be to contact _The Center for
Progressive Christianity_ (http://tcpc.org/template/index.cfm) (e-mail
fplumer at TCPC.org). Fred Plumer, the executive head, is in touch with churches of all
denominations across the United States and he can recommend to you those
congregations who have signed up with his organization.
The Episcopal Dean of Trinity Cathedral, Cleveland, the _Very Rev. Tracey
Lind_ (http://www.trinitycleveland.org/people/lind.html) , might be able to
direct you to progressive Episcopal Churches, but she might not be familiar with
other traditions, and my sense is that if you find a Presbyterian Church that
connects you to your own religious past that would be, I believe, the most
desirable.
I have done lectures in Ohio in Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus, Toledo,
Akron, and Dayton, just to name the places that come immediately to mind. From
those experiences I can guarantee you that there are churches in that great
state that will allow question and debate and that will not be bound by a first
century view of the Bible, a 4th century view of the creeds or a 13th
century view of doctrine and liturgy. The traditional churches are dying today and
until they open themselves to dialogue with the world and allow their literal
claims to be challenged, they will continue to die. People like you, even at
age 82 (you are five years my senior), have the capacity to help bring about
that change.
Good luck and I hope you find a place where you can both be fed and make a
difference.
– John Shelby Spong
**************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog,
plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com.
(http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20080911/93556af9/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Dialogue
mailing list