[Dialogue] Fifth day of 2009
SVESjaime at aol.com
SVESjaime at aol.com
Sat Jan 3 07:42:28 EST 2009
School reopens Monday and I am on a roll. The following should be in the
Monday Saipan Tribune edition.
Usual disclaimer: those interested in my Monday musings, you're welcome;
those not, move on.
A RITE OF ACCOUNTABILITY
One of my treasured fantasies is an imagined scene at the government center
up Capital Hill in one of the buildings, maybe the covered assembly hall just
behind the Legislature. It would be at the end of the calendar year, or the
first week of January, when the legislative, executive and judicial officers
would convene in a brief ritual of accountability.
But first, a context: In life, structures of accountability abound.
Driving lagoon-ward from San Vicente down the hill to lower Dandan are three
stoplights. Careening down at 35 miles per hour can easily lead to accelerated
speeds from gravitational momentum, and the lights serve as an effective reminder
of limits and possibilities.
Whether it be in the political, economic and cultural realms, there are
usually two valid perspectives that people adhere to, which are often labeled
'conservative' and 'progressive.' The first one reflects the understanding that
life is bounded by limits, and society is best served if social constraints are
in place so that everyone is clear what and where the boundaries are, and
people refrain from doing what is consensed verboten. This view is very rule
oriented, and people try to conserve the gains from the past to ensure that
wisdom learned are not lost, and mistakes made are not repeated.
The second perspective focuses on possibilities, the adventure of moving
beyond proscribed boxes in order to explore the frontiers of progress and discover
the cutting edge that makes the unknown known. The human journey is in fact
served by a wedgeblade of those who dare use their bodies and social
groupings to further push the gains of human culture to realms where no one had gone
before, to stand as it were between the no-longer and the not-yet. The
dialectic between these two seemingly opposing forces constitutes the Hegelian
synthesis, thereby acknowledging the essential function of each in the waltzing
journey of the whole.
Thus, in the ritual of accountability, someone like the Bishop Thomas A.
Camacho, or another symbolic figure outside the three branches of governance,
would stand in front of the gathered assembly of public officials, and ask the
question: “Have you been faithful to your covenant to serve, defend and promote
the well-being of the Commonwealth this past year?”
The specific oath in the Commonwealth Constitution, Article XVII, Section 1
reads: I do solemnly affirm (or swear) that I will support and defend the
Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the
Covenant To Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political
Union with the United States of America, the applicable provisions of the
Constitution, laws and treaties of the United States of America, and that I will
faithfully discharge my duties to the best of my ability (so help me God).
Were this rite be led by a religious cleric conversant in the tradition of
confessions and absolutions, then s/he may let the same dynamic apply, only in
secular terms. Confession would be a lucid acknowledgment of what had
transpired and not be the guilt-ridden moralistic condemnation that often accompanies
self-righteousness piety.
Obviously, the authentic answer to such a question would be a “Yes and No,”
or “No and Yes,” i.e., everyone begins with a decidedly positive or negative
(or, proactive or oppositional) stance but that in the due course of serving
one's functions, one either by commission or omission, deviates from original
intents, one performs its opposites, or resign to passive indifference that
allows inaction itself to become the active choice.
There would be those fanatic absolutists who will insist that they were 100%
faithful to their covenant, and proudly defend in their minds every thought
and action they had taken during the year to be in full conformity to the oath
they made in the assumption of their offices, its roles and functions.
Self-deception being an unshakable human habit do get some folks stuck in extremes,
but the honest and conscientious person would stand present, with not a little
bit of humility, to the ambiguity and mystery of human wisdom and behavior.
To be sure, each could translate each response to a quantitative scale so
that one may imagine that the “Yes” was 70% of the time while a petulant “No”
was 30% of the time, or vice-versa. But one would understand that quantity is
not what's being assessed, rather, the quality of one's consciousness and
understanding is what is being held accountable.
Now, in the old European understanding from which objective assessments
evolved, confession without absolution is tyranny, and absolution without
confession is libertinism. This is where a Bishop Camacho, or one of symbolic
standing, could pronounce the secular metaphors of absolution. The pronouncement
would be a recognition that whatever had transpired the year before, it is done,
finis infinitus. There is no way that the past can be undone, save in sci-fi
imaginations of parallel universes. To be sure, there are objective audits
and performance evaluations built in to systems, as well as laws and
prohibitions that result in consequences when violated, but the point of the absolution
would be the affirmation that wishing things had happened differently is a
futile exercise, or worst, blame seeking is irreversibly counter productive.
The absolution would be a declaration that where we are in the present, just as
we are without apology, is an adequate point of new beginnings, that it is in
the nature of the future that it is open to innumerable choices and that one
only needs to decide to create that which is new!
Imagine that some dynamic like this is programmed into our neurological and
social networks, and that social organizations and individuals can indeed begin
at zero, and a tabula rasa, an imaginal clean slate accompanies the launching
of a new year. This is not a novel idea. The Government of Singapore during
Lee Kuan Yew's time practiced zero budgeting where a department begins every
fiscal year at zero regardless of how they functioned during the previous
fiscal year.
Brain/mind research is discovering that human behavior follows rites and
rituals that it had created, and that normal and abnormal functioning (e.g.,
obsessive-compulsive disorders) is determined by our adherence to those human-made
rituals. When there is intentionality in the performance of the ritual, then
it is healthy. If the ritual puts consciousness in a reflexive mode so that
the ritual determines behavior rather than the other way around, then ritual
becomes master rather than servant to the adherents.
On the last Friday of the month in my 6th grade class, we eat lunch together,
and we lift up the birthday celebrants during the month. We practice an
accountability ritual of a sort. The celebrant is asked what the highlight of
the year had been and what expectation s/he has for the coming year. Then
s/he is asked: “Have you been faithful to being the one, unique, unrepeatable
(the student's name) in history that you are, of which there has never been one
like you before, and there will never be another one like you ever again?”
The students are still getting used to the yin-yang of the “Yes and No,” and “
No and Yes” answers, but intuitively, they recognize the authenticity, if not
accuracy, of the responses.
Litigation and its adversarial nature has become the mode of our
accountability structures, and its artifice is deadly. Would that we discover again the
naturalness of being held accountable, and the glorious reality that the past
brooks no malice, the present invites affirmation and celebration, and the
future remains wondrously open and free.
Jaime R. Vergara
Saipan
**************
Stay up-to-date on the latest news - from fashion trends
to celebrity break-ups and everything in between.
(http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000024)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20090103/15ad8a2e/attachment.html>
More information about the Dialogue
mailing list