[Dialogue] Social Process Imbalance and Pressure Points

[marilyncrocker at juno.com]

Steve,

This is similar to what struck me as I thought about the relationship of
the "systems thinking" work Peter Senge introduced back in the early 90s
in his book The Fifth Discipline.  I used both Senge's conceptual
"archetypes" (negative & positive feedback loops etc.) and the conceptual
framework of our social process triangles in a doctoral paper on the
topic of teacher burnout.  

Marilyn


Marilyn R. Crocker, Ed.D
Crocker & Associates, Inc.
123 Sanborn Road
West Newfield, ME 04095
(207) 793-3711

On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:34:46 -0600 steve har <stevehar11201 at gmail.com>
writes:
I believe the imbalance idea likely came from
General Systems Theory & Kenneth Boulding
The balancing is a notion in feedback/feed forward loop logic


For example 
one side of the teter-totter goes down the other goes up; or


if you add gas to your car the gas level in the car goes up and the gas
level in the gas station goes down.


The idea is to represent change in a system  not a static model. There
are moving parts in systems and "flows"


At a gas station...there is a pressure point -the valve at the pump - if
you change the pressure point change happens and gas flows 


When you do this the car's gas tank is balanced to a new level when a
valve in the gas pump notices the change in pressure.


Often systems have three [or more] parts for example the hot water
heater, the bathtub, the kitchen sink [with related valves]


So imbalance triangles and pressure points were attempts to visualize
ways to make change in a system... to rebalance an imbalance- in a 3 part
system. 


Without pressure points, flows, imbalances  you are left with a static
model in which there is no place for change. It seems to me we wanted to
represent opportunities to make social change not stasis.


The establishment process  lives with or is the economic tyrant [to use
the rather quaint terms of the time]; 


The disestablishment is the political ally [like a "loyal" political
opposition], 


The transestablishment or the cultural process is the  meaning making
dynamic that tells a new story and "re balances" the social order by
changing the system.


The model is genius design and profound thinking for the 1970s; time
marches on. There are tools and simulations that really are dynamic now
not artful representations. It is a bit like comparing an old static
photo to a new video. 


 It would be very interesting to update some of the social process
triangle work with some of these new software tools like Stella & iThink.


It would be splendid piece of creative work to upgrade the social process
triangles to current times;  something like this video clip where Twyla
Tharp takes a dance step from long ago and makes a splendid ballet called
"Bakers Dozen". See: http://poss.posterous.com/34574499. 


I think we could make a splendid "ballet" out of the social process
triangles.
Taking brilliant models from the past and dusting them off for current
times seems exactly what a new ICA era should do.


For a picture of how people seem to be making models like the social
process triangles now see:http://www.systems-thinking.org/intst/int.htm


Thoughts? Steve Harrington
____________________________________________________________
Mortgage Rates Hit 2.99%
If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Gov't Refi Programs
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d374f2b2709ecbd661st06vuc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20110119/90950c03/attachment.html>