[Dialogue] More on Making & Using Stick Charts?

[Joyce Bonafield]

So Steve, write an let us hear where you are ....Chicago?  Brooklyn? Costa Rica?  and what you are doing ...in addition to Archives :)       (sent you a note the other day)
 
Joyce Bonafield-Pierce
and Lewie Pierce

--- On Wed, 5/4/11, steve har <stevehar11201 at gmail.com> wrote:


From: steve har <stevehar11201 at gmail.com>
Subject: [Dialogue] More on Making & Using Stick Charts?
To: dialogue at wedgeblade.net
Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2011, 12:19 PM


Still thinking about the previous Randy & Gene et al exchange
and stick chart models and all
and wishing for more...

---

Randy seems to have life experience looking for event->story->mythology which
might be describable in new religious mode lingo something like

Being is->an account of Doing->which generates an expression of
knowing [mythology]

---

Gene seems to have a model - the new religious mode-
like a set of distinctions in language which aim or beg for something
of human experience

---

Some current philosophers would call the 1st a
World-to-Word fit more like ontology* and
the 2nd a Word-to-World fit more like epistemology
[Not “Ontot-heology” as the philosopher Hilary Putnam calls it – the
version dealing with the existence of God]

---
a couple of more fragments for fun:
-the 3 umpires
-1st novice ump: when it comes across the plate like this "___" what
do you call it?
-2nd experienced ump: well, I just call it like I see it
-3rd master ump: Listen, It ain't nothing until I call it.

---

Quote from Master Dogen 13 C Japan from the Genjo Koan

What did the monk see that he expressed by bowing?



--
Steve Harrington

_______________________________________________
Dialogue mailing list
Dialogue at wedgeblade.net
http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/dialogue_wedgeblade.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20110504/c3bf173e/attachment.html>