[Oe List ...] [Dialogue] Order annuity

Thu Apr 23 22:57:48 EDT 2009

For those of us who not present in 1998, it would be helpful if someone who was there to rehearse for the rest of us what actually. I have heard bits and pieces from several individuals over the intervening years.  I have yet to hear or read a coherent description that gives me more the a mere inkling of what actually happened. I know even less about what happen in 1984. I am not looking for a thesis paper, but something on the order of a collegium talk. 

David Walters

  Dear David,

  With you, Joe and I have wondered how, with what criteria, and when the decisions about the annuity were made, since when we travelled to Oaxtapec in November of 1988, we still understood ourselves to be the Order.  After 20 years in the OE at that point, we, like you, were somehow "factored out" and received nothing from the Order annuity.

  There is a plethora of documentation to support our "entitlement"to the Order annuity, but when Joe was told after repeated conversations with Carol Pierce, that somehow, we were "no longer considered on the assignment chart as of November 1988," I urged Joe to "just forget it."  This happened after our having risked much in continuing to provide self support over the years to the OE as the Orlando "outpost" to the turbulently changing Primary Unit configurations, to which we had been annexed in at least 4 different entities in fewer years -- Jamaica, Atlanta, Houston, and finally Chicago --often with fledgling priorship. 

  I was reminded of the passage in Scripture that suggests there comes a time when one is not being heard that it is time to "shake the dust off one's feet" and just move ahead into the future. And that is what we have tried to do.  

  Unfortunately for us now, but not for the OE then, Joe and I withdrew all of our personal funds, including my teachers retirement account, when the Move 222 was initiated in the late '60s.  This was just before we and David McCleskey left to conduct a teaching trek through SEAPAC and later, in August, were assigned as faculty for the first ITI in Singapore.  At that time we trusted so fully in our corporate mission and willingly gave all for it.  Furthermore, we believed that "retirement" was not a category that had meaning for our future; we envisioned unfolding engagement in ministry into the sunset.

  David, I think our colleagues who made decisions about how to "parcel out" the OE funds, did so the best they could, given who they were and what they had to work with.  Clearly, they did not hold all the values I, personally, would have hoped.  Nor were the outcomes of their decisions equitable at all.  I think it would be helpful for all of us to get clear about what was the "complex formula" that was used to determine equity, and how it could have possibly excluded many who should have benefited, and been ensured the care that we all professed to one another would be available.

  I admire that you have had the courage to place this unresolved issue on the collegium table, so that the community can hear it, and "sit with it."  I trust those who made the stark decisions about calling the Order out of being in 1988, clearly without a community consensus, might think about "what they might have wrought."

  I am guessing that you, like Joe and me, are the remnants who still wear the "ring", because we have, indeed, never "left" the Order.  

  With gratitude and abiding affection,

  Marilyn

  On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:58:35 -0600 David Dunn <dmdunn1 at gmail.com> writes:
    On Apr 22, 2009, at 4:41 PM, McCabe, Diann A wrote:

      Around the meetings in 1986 and 1988 when OE as a structure was ended, the small remaining amounts in order funds were distributed based on a complicated formula.

    It has been one of the great sadnesses of the last 25 years that I have somehow not been able to participate in that symbol of membership in the order I never left.

    How might we symbolize the gift and the blessing of perpetual vows?

    David

    ---
    David Dunn
    dmdunn1 at gmail.com

  Marilyn R. Crocker, Ed.D
  Crocker & Associates, Inc.
  123 Sanborn Road
  West Newfield, ME 04095
  (207) 793-3711

  ____________________________________________________________ 
  Click to get your online credit check report & score.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  _______________________________________________
  OE mailing list
  OE at wedgeblade.net
  http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/oe_wedgeblade.net

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG. 
  Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.12.3/2076 - Release Date: 4/23/2009 6:30 AM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/oe_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20090423/85966f18/attachment.html>