[Oe List ...] all the earth belongs to all the people

James Wiegel jfwiegel at yahoo.com
Sun Aug 30 07:05:45 CDT 2009


Wasn't there a talk or something called, "The Liberal Heresy".  I think JWM worked on it . . . anyone have a copy?

Part of my struggle in all this has to do with the assumption that "national governments" are the key (remember Chardin, "The Age of Nations is Past" . . .) and that there is a thin line from progressive or liberal to conservative or libertarian and any answer has to be somewhere on that line . . .  reminds me of the book "Flatland" where the hero was a dot living in a 2 dimensional world . . .

Jim



Coincidence is the spiritual equivalent of a pun.  G. K. Chesterton



Jim Wiegel

401 North Beverly Way, Tolleson, Arizona 85353-2401

+1  623-936-8671   +1  623-363-3277

   jfwiegel at yahoo.com   www.partnersinparticipation.com

--- On Sat, 8/29/09, Clare Whitney <cla9ken8 at ecentral.com> wrote:

From: Clare Whitney <cla9ken8 at ecentral.com>
Subject: Re: [Oe List ...] all the earth belongs to all the people
To: "Order Ecumenical Community" <oe at wedgeblade.net>
Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009, 2:56 PM



 
Yea Jim - a voice of broadened reason sounds in the 
air of this conversation.  How I wish more people could climb out of their 
ideologies and think about other people who really are their neighbors - 
including the guy who bellowed at me on a street corner to give him two quarters 
for the bus and when I did yelled louder that he needed a dollar instead.  
(That didn't happen - the light turned green and I fled.)  I hope he caught 
a bus eventually, but he is also my neighbor, and appeared to be homeless in a 
very wealthy country, called the United States of America when last I 
looked.
 
Love to you and Alice,  Clare W.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: 
  Jim Baumbach 
  
  To: Order Ecumenical Community 
  Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 2:51 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Oe List ...] all the earth 
  belongs to all the people
  
This kind of conversation always seems to lead to 
  extremes.  And all I can think of is that conservatives live in a totally 
  different universe.  They seem to be so worried about Socialism when most 
  of their existence in the US is socialistic.  Can you imagine what our 
  highway system across this country would be like if it was left in the hands 
  of private corporations?  Government (federal, state or local) seems to 
  be doing a pretty good job there.  Of course it would also be a very 
  exciting time if the laws governing traffic were created by private 
  enterprise.  When we have a police emergency I pray to God no Black 
  mercenary thugs come to my house and shoot up all my neighbors.  Our cops 
  on on the public payroll and that seems to work very well.  Of course 
  that is socialism!  And when there is a fire to put out nearby, I am 
  happy the firefighters hired by our socialistic government are there to 
  control things.  And the water they use comes from the local socialist 
  government sources free to whomever needs a drink.  Fortunately, we don't 
  have to worry about the poor getting water.  And who sets the standards 
  for the water quality through out our nation?  Not the private 
  sector!  And what about sewage?  Hmm, dirty rotten socialists at it 
  again.  Clean water, clean air, and speaking about air, who keeps all 
  those planes from crashing into each other?  Who sets the 
  standards?  Who enforces the standards?  And those god-awful public 
  schools and universities is this socialism or what?  And I would caution 
  conservatives not to go into public libraries, parks, public buildings because 
  they all smack of the "S" word.  And the construction standards used to 
  keep all of our buildings from collapsing on our heads, who sets and enforces 
  those standards?  Don't forget that the US has it share of natural 
  disasters that the government is expected to help protect us from and clean up 
  afterwards.  So whose afraid of the socialist boogeyperson?  
  

And why should adequate, affordable health care be denied to 
  anyone?

Jim Baumbach

Marsha Hahn wrote: 
  
    #yiv759816105 DIV {
MARGIN:0px;}


    
    Susan and all,
     
    What a stimulating conversation!  Thank you, Marshall, for getting 
    it started.  To respond to Susan, the American government is a 
    government "of the people."  That's one of our core principles.  
    That means I'm the government, and so are you.  I am REALLY trying to 
    figure out how to play a constructive role as an individual citizen, 
    responsible for my government, in this health care debate.
     
    It is precisely from the place of kindness and generosity, which you 
    mention below, that I wish to make decent health care available to my fellow 
    human beings - and to which I, out of kindness and generosity, would gladly 
    contribute to make happen.  We need to reclaim our ownership of our 
    government - it is US.
     
    My thoughts.
     
    Marsha

    

    
    
    From: Susan Fertig <susan at gmdtech.com>
To: Order Ecumenical Community <oe at wedgeblade.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 
    12:49:33 PM
Subject: Re: 
    [Oe List ...] all the earth belongs to all the people


    Jack and Paul, First of all, I appreciate your taking 
    my question seriously and not just dismissing it as uncaring or 
    unthinking.
     
    Next, I think what has always distinguished people of 
    successful community is that they CHOOSE to care for each other.  Not 
    that there is a governing body (the Soviet?) requiring it and thereby 
    diminishing to nothing the human spirit.
     
    Finally, I do not believe that anyone or any 
    government "owes" me medical care, or food, or a home, or a car, or any 
    of the things that everyone seems to take for granted. If I am unable to 
    provide those things for myself, then I truly do hope there will be kind and 
    generous people who will help me.  But not, please God, my 
    government.
     
    I have been so dismayed by our pell mell helter skelter 
    descent into socialism within an oh-so-short handful of months that I am no 
    longer a conservative.  I have lost all balance I ever had and have 
    fallen right over into libertarianism (not, of course, the LaRouche style 
    version).  
     
    Susan
     
    Susan Fertig-Dykes
    tel: 
    (703) 751-5956
     

    
    
    From: oe-bounces at wedgeblade.net [mailto:oe-bounces at wedgeblade.net] 
    On Behalf Of Jack Gilles
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 
    12:09 PM
To: Order Ecumenical Community
Subject: Re: [Oe 
    List ...] all the earth belongs to all the people

Dear 
    Susan, 
    

    I too think this is a question that needs a thoughtful answer.  I 
    am grateful for Paul's response as it is, as it should be, from the heart 
    which is the means by which this community dialogues.
    

    I remember JWM reminding us that first and foremost we were born into 
    humanity, not family, community or nation.  Therefore, it is the 
    humanity of us all that we stand before as equals, and with a mutual 
    responsibility.  That said, each of us has a responsibility for how 
    that life is lived and cared for.  We bare the responsibility for our 
    actions, including those that lead to consequences of illness and poor 
    well-being.  But there are issues of wellness that are beyond our 
    individual control, be those of birth, accident or social circumstances. 
     For these we need to ask, whom will be responsible for the healing and 
    care?  In that question it is clear that our (USA) social structures 
    and consciousness is in need of strengthening, including our understanding 
    of death.
    

    We all know of the issues of families not willing to care for, nor 
    honor the dignity and role of elders in their lives.  We have developed 
    vast industries to hide this responsibility, to render the elders 
    subservient to youth and deny a legitimate profound role in our collective 
    community.  We also know that we have lost community in and through 
    which care needs to be acted out.  We have seen so many fine examples 
    of community care including many that have financial structural designs that 
    seem to work well.  In a "perfect world" perhaps this model of caring 
    community with equitable structures would be what we need to build.  I 
    would share with what I imagine is your concern that once a "right" is 
    designated at such a large level as the US economy and society things not 
    only get complicated and often too expensive, but it keeps us from facing 
    the more ontological needs of building our local communities and our 
    individual responsibilities for ourselves and our neighbors.   It 
    hinders the necessary dialogue on what care should we collectively render 
    (i.e. unlimited end of life treatments at all costs, who gets transplants 
    etc.).   We have a very profound dialogue that needs to occur around 
    these issues that isn't taking place, at least at a national level.  In 
    other words, the issue of "the right of care for all" when implied at the 
    national level, is not dealing with the contradictions and therefore, I 
    believe, will not lead to the solutions we need to develop.  Without 
    elaboration, we who live in the Litibu community of Mexico are presently 
    facing such community care issues.
    

    That said, it remains to say which present options being discussed will 
    take us towards our goal of all of us caring for all in a way that brings us 
    into full mutual love and responsibility.  I am not totally clear as to 
    which model does that and what model keeps us further away from the real 
    contradictions of our common good.
    

    Grace & Peace,
    

    Jack

    
    On Aug 29, 2009, at 2:46 AM, PSchrijnen at aol.com wrote:

    
      
      Why? What a great question, Susan.
       
      I was on top of Table Mountain yesterday. The cable car and 
      facilities on top of the mountain were refurbished about 10 years ago, and 
      Mandela opened it: declaring it SA's gift to the earth. He declared it so. 
      An act of generosity.  Of hope. And most people on top of the 
      mountain were South Africans, most of them black, but there were accents 
      and shades of all colours of the rainbow. 
       
      So, thanks Susan, for letting me ponder that question.
       
      By the way, the top of Table Mountain is sacred space. There is an 
      awe in the air. People whisper thoughtfully, aware of the presence of the 
      mystery. I wept at times in the presence of this perspective on the 
      beautiful earth on which I live. 
       
      Paul
      <table%20mountain.JPG>
       _______________________________________________
OE 
      mailing list
OE at wedgeblade.net
http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/oe_wedgeblade.net


_______________________________________________
OE mailing list
OE at wedgeblade.net
http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/oe_wedgeblade.net
  
  
  

  _______________________________________________
OE mailing 
  list
OE at wedgeblade.net
http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/oe_wedgeblade.net

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
OE mailing list
OE at wedgeblade.net
http://wedgeblade.net/mailman/listinfo/oe_wedgeblade.net



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/oe_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20090830/48740cf2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the OE mailing list