[Oe List ...] NY Times editorial - AWE

[LAURELCG at aol.com]

In a message dated 12/8/2010 9:26:04 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
icabombay at igc.org writes:

Dear  Laurel,  


Just to share with you and others that there are other alternative  
understandings.  There are many scientists who do not "buy" into the Big  Bang 
theory at all.  There is a highly respected group who have talked  that we live 
in a "steady state" universe with continuous creation and  destruction of 
galaxies.  The "red shift" that is one of the "proofs"  cited for the Big Bang 
theory can be explained in other ways that do not have  the distant 
galaxies receding at ever increasing speeds.  I know that  this is counter to the 
CW, but I, for one, am a follower of the steady state  universe.  This is a 
very complex and highly scientific argument, but  just to let you know that 
there are other explanations that do not require  exotic solutions.   For 
those who might be interested in this other view  they can contact me, but I 
don't think this is the forum for exploring  theories, but I do appreciate 
your reflection on the awesome mystery we are a  part of.


Jack




Thanks, Jack. "Laurel" aka Jann McGuire
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://wedgeblade.net/pipermail/oe_wedgeblade.net/attachments/20101208/5dad1fbb/attachment-0001.html>